mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] rcu/nocb: Consolidate rcu_nocb_cpu_offload/deoffload functions
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 12:05:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <155c20ce-b390-4499-9a1d-97f78ce8208a@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aahQhlPp3Qqm4Bwg@localhost.localdomain>



On 3/4/2026 10:32 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 06:04:32PM -0500, Joel Fernandes a écrit :
>> The rcu_nocb_cpu_offload() and rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload() functions are
>> nearly duplicates.
>>
>> Therefore, extract the common logic into rcu_nocb_cpu_toggle_offload()
>> which takes an 'offload' boolean, and make both exported functions
>> simple wrappers.
>>
>> This eliminates a bunch of duplicate code at the call sites, namely
>> mutex locking, CPU hotplug locking and CPU online checks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> index b3337c7231cc..5b041134d6bb 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
>> @@ -1081,30 +1081,6 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
>> -{
>> -	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
>> -	int ret = 0;
>> -
>> -	cpus_read_lock();
>> -	mutex_lock(&rcu_state.nocb_mutex);
>> -	if (rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
>> -		if (!cpu_online(cpu)) {
>> -			ret = rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(rdp);
>> -			if (!ret)
>> -				cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
>> -		} else {
>> -			pr_info("NOCB: Cannot CB-deoffload online CPU %d\n", rdp->cpu);
>> -			ret = -EINVAL;
>> -		}
>> -	}
>> -	mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.nocb_mutex);
>> -	cpus_read_unlock();
>> -
>> -	return ret;
>> -}
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload);
>> -
>>  static bool rcu_nocb_rdp_offload_wait_cond(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long flags;
>> @@ -1149,27 +1125,54 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Common helper for CPU offload/deoffload operations. */
>> +static int rcu_nocb_cpu_toggle_offload(int cpu, bool offload)
>> +{
>> +	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
>> +	bool currently_offloaded;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	cpus_read_lock();
>> +	mutex_lock(&rcu_state.nocb_mutex);
>> +
>> +	currently_offloaded = rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp);
> 
> Do we really need that extra variable?

No we don't need it, fixed.

> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> 

Thanks!

-- 
Joel Fernandes


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-04 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-24 23:04 [PATCH RFC v1 0/4] rcu/nocb: Clean ups and rcutorture test configs Joel Fernandes
2026-02-24 23:04 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] rcu/nocb: Consolidate rcu_nocb_cpu_offload/deoffload functions Joel Fernandes
2026-03-04 15:32   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-04 17:05     ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2026-02-24 23:04 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/4] rcu/nocb: Extract nocb_bypass_needs_flush() to reduce duplication Joel Fernandes
2026-03-11 12:58   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-24 23:04 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/4] rcutorture: Add NOCB01 config for RCU_LAZY torture testing Joel Fernandes
2026-03-11 13:02   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-24 23:04 ` [PATCH RFC v1 4/4] rcutorture: Add NOCB02 config for nocb poll mode testing Joel Fernandes
2026-02-25 21:47   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-02-26  0:14     ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-11 13:03   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=155c20ce-b390-4499-9a1d-97f78ce8208a@nvidia.com \
    --to=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®