From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [v5 5/6] powerpc/mce: Handle UE event for memcpy_mcsafe
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:52:59 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1562838616.xzrha67fy6.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190709121524.18762-6-santosh@fossix.org>
Santosh Sivaraj's on July 9, 2019 10:15 pm:
> If we take a UE on one of the instructions with a fixup entry, set nip
> to continue execution at the fixup entry. Stop processing the event
> further or print it.
So... what happens if we take a machine check while we happen to be
executing some other kernel operation with a fixup entry?
Or the other way around, what happens if memcpy_mcsafe takes a page
fault for some reason (e.g., kernel bug it tries to access unmapped
memory).
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-11 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-09 12:15 [v5 0/6] powerpc: implement machine check safe memcpy Santosh Sivaraj
2019-07-09 12:15 ` [v5 1/6] powerpc/mce: Make machine_check_ue_event() static Santosh Sivaraj
2019-07-09 12:15 ` [v5 2/6] powerpc/mce: Fix MCE handling for huge pages Santosh Sivaraj
2019-07-11 9:38 ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-07-09 12:15 ` [v5 3/6] powerpc/memcpy: Add memcpy_mcsafe for pmem Santosh Sivaraj
2019-07-11 9:50 ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-07-09 12:15 ` [v5 4/6] extable: Add function to search only kernel exception table Santosh Sivaraj
2019-07-11 9:47 ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-07-09 12:15 ` [v5 5/6] powerpc/mce: Handle UE event for memcpy_mcsafe Santosh Sivaraj
2019-07-11 9:52 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2019-07-09 12:15 ` [v5 6/6] powerpc: add machine check safe copy_to_user Santosh Sivaraj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1562838616.xzrha67fy6.astroid@bobo.none \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arbab@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=santosh@fossix.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®