From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] powerpc/time: Only set CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SCALED_CPUTIME on PPC64
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 23:56:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1566222563.zuxi8x5ryi.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26969bb5-c01b-0674-5773-027f1851bd44@c-s.fr>
Christophe Leroy's on August 14, 2019 4:31 pm:
> Hi Nick,
>
>
> Le 07/06/2018 à 03:43, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:21:08 +0000 (UTC)
>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> scaled cputime is only meaningfull when the processor has
>>> SPURR and/or PURR, which means only on PPC64.
>>>
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> I wonder if we could make this depend on PPC_PSERIES or even
>> PPC_SPLPAR as well? (That would be for a later patch)
>
> Can we go further on this ?
>
> Do we know exactly which configuration support scaled cputime, in
> extenso have SPRN_SPURR and/or SPRN_PURR ?
>
> Ref https://github.com/linuxppc/issues/issues/171
Unfortunately I don't know enough about the timing stuff and who
uses it. SPURR is available on all configurations (guest, bare metal),
so it could account scaled time there too. I guess better just leave
it for now.
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-19 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-06 14:21 Christophe Leroy
2018-06-06 14:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] powerpc/time: no steal_time when CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR is not selected Christophe Leroy
2018-06-07 1:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] powerpc/time: Only set CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SCALED_CPUTIME on PPC64 Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-14 6:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-08-19 13:56 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2019-08-20 12:42 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1566222563.zuxi8x5ryi.astroid@bobo.none \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®