[tip: perf/core] perf/x86/amd: Remove set but not used variable 'active'

["tip-bot2 for Zheng Yongjun" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>]

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     010fe58de2d5ebb86903f74db4402c474434e08c
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/010fe58de2d5ebb86903f74db4402c474434e08c
Author:        Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com>
AuthorDate:    Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:44:53 +08:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 08:01:16 +01:00

perf/x86/amd: Remove set but not used variable 'active'

'-Wunused-but-set-variable' triggers this warning:

  arch/x86/events/amd/core.c: In function amd_pmu_handle_irq:
  arch/x86/events/amd/core.c:656:6: warning: variable active set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

GCC is right, 'active' is not used anymore.

This variable was introduced earlier this year and then removed in:

  df4d29732fdad perf/x86/amd: Change/fix NMI latency mitigation to use a timestamp

[ mingo: Improved the changelog. ]

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com>
Cc: <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191110094453.113001-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/amd/core.c |  9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
index 64c3e70..1ff652a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
@@ -653,14 +653,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 static int amd_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-	int active, handled;
-
-	/*
-	 * Obtain the active count before calling x86_pmu_handle_irq() since
-	 * it is possible that x86_pmu_handle_irq() may make a counter
-	 * inactive (through x86_pmu_stop).
-	 */
-	active = __bitmap_weight(cpuc->active_mask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
+	int handled;
 
 	/* Process any counter overflows */
 	handled = x86_pmu_handle_irq(regs);