mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: irq/core] irq_work: Fix irq_work_claim() memory ordering
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:32:32 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157346475270.29376.12510079913530639928.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108160858.31665-3-frederic@kernel.org>

The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     25269871db1ad0cbbaafd5098cbdb40c8db4ccb9
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/25269871db1ad0cbbaafd5098cbdb40c8db4ccb9
Author:        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 08 Nov 2019 17:08:56 +01:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:03:31 +01:00

irq_work: Fix irq_work_claim() memory ordering

When irq_work_claim() finds IRQ_WORK_PENDING flag already set, we just
return and don't raise a new IPI. We expect the destination to see
and handle our latest updades thanks to the pairing atomic_xchg()
in irq_work_run_list().

But cmpxchg() doesn't guarantee a full memory barrier upon failure. So
it's possible that the destination misses our latest updates.

So use atomic_fetch_or() instead that is unconditionally fully ordered
and also performs exactly what we want here and simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E . McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108160858.31665-3-frederic@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/irq_work.c | 22 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index df0dbf4..255454a 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -29,24 +29,16 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, lazy_list);
  */
 static bool irq_work_claim(struct irq_work *work)
 {
-	int flags, oflags, nflags;
+	int oflags;
 
+	oflags = atomic_fetch_or(IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED, &work->flags);
 	/*
-	 * Start with our best wish as a premise but only trust any
-	 * flag value after cmpxchg() result.
+	 * If the work is already pending, no need to raise the IPI.
+	 * The pairing atomic_xchg() in irq_work_run() makes sure
+	 * everything we did before is visible.
 	 */
-	flags = atomic_read(&work->flags) & ~IRQ_WORK_PENDING;
-	for (;;) {
-		nflags = flags | IRQ_WORK_CLAIMED;
-		oflags = atomic_cmpxchg(&work->flags, flags, nflags);
-		if (oflags == flags)
-			break;
-		if (oflags & IRQ_WORK_PENDING)
-			return false;
-		flags = oflags;
-		cpu_relax();
-	}
-
+	if (oflags & IRQ_WORK_PENDING)
+		return false;
 	return true;
 }
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-11  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-08 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] irq_work: Fix ordering issue Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-08 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] irq_work: Convert flags to atomic_t Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-11  8:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-11 22:56     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-11  9:32   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-08 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] irq_work: Fix irq_work_claim() ordering Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-11  7:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-11 23:17     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-11  9:32   ` tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2019-11-08 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] irq_work: Slightly simplify IRQ_WORK_PENDING clearing Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-11  9:32   ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-12 20:27   ` [PATCH 3/4] " Leonard Crestez
2019-11-13  0:22     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-08 16:08 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] irq_work: Weaken ordering in irq_work_run_list() Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-11  8:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-11 22:38     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=157346475270.29376.12510079913530639928.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®