From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>
To: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH] sched/debug: reject zero writes to numa_balancing scan_size_mb
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:54:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15737be71f5843cbbbc1d0bf8de9f7fb@baidu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721091821.3613257-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2026 at 01:30PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> > + debugfs_create_file("scan_size_mb", 0644, numa,
> > + &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size, &numa_scan_size_fops);
>
> DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE() is meant to be paired with
> debugfs_create_file_unsafe() rather than debugfs_create_file():
> debugfs_attr_read()/write() already take removal protection via
> debugfs_file_get()/put(), so debugfs_create_file() just adds a redundant
> full_proxy layer. The "verbose" knob in this same file uses
> debugfs_create_file_unsafe() for that reason.
>
> > + if (val == 0 || val > UINT_MAX)
> > + return -ERANGE;
>
> The changelog says the value is rejected with -EINVAL, but the code returns
> -ERANGE -- could you make the two consistent? -ERANGE is fine.
>
> The write-time rejection is the right approach; just the two points above.
>
Thanks, I will send v2 with your advice.
[Li,Rongqing]
> Thanks,
> Xusheng
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 5:30 lirongqing
2026-07-21 9:18 ` Zhan Xusheng
2026-07-21 9:54 ` Li,Rongqing [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15737be71f5843cbbbc1d0bf8de9f7fb@baidu.com \
--to=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®