From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 07:24:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 07:24:17 -0400 Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]:60631 "EHLO mons.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 07:24:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15762.61332.832333.272997@charged.uio.no> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:29:24 +0200 To: Richard Gooch Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [BUG] NFS in 2.4.20-pre6+ stalls In-Reply-To: <200209251530.g8PFUeI13628@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> References: <200209251441.37444.trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> <200209251530.g8PFUeI13628@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Richard Gooch writes: > Monday afternoon (my time) I grabbed the current BK tree and > have been using it since then. The problem has been reduced. I > thought it was fixed, but just as I sent this message, I tried > my little test again, and in one of the three runs I had a 21 > second stall. I waited a few minutes between tests. > Is your patch meant for the latest BK tree? Or something older? The patch should apply fine to the latest BK tree: there have been no recent changes that might affect it. Cheers, Trond