From: "tip-bot2 for Alex Shi" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86 <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/cputime: move rq parameter in irqtime_account_process_tick
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:08:41 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <157925572173.396.14623531131441259192.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1577959674-255537-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 9dec1b6949ae9509cdc3edb2d75fda39c9db9fa2
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/9dec1b6949ae9509cdc3edb2d75fda39c9db9fa2
Author: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 18:07:52 +08:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:19:21 +01:00
sched/cputime: move rq parameter in irqtime_account_process_tick
Every time we call irqtime_account_process_tick() is in a interrupt,
Every caller will get and assign a parameter rq = this_rq(), This is
unnecessary and increase the code size a little bit. Move the rq getting
action to irqtime_account_process_tick internally is better.
base with this patch
cputime.o 578792 bytes 577888 bytes
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1577959674-255537-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index d43318a..cff3e65 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times)
* softirq as those do not count in task exec_runtime any more.
*/
static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
- struct rq *rq, int ticks)
+ int ticks)
{
u64 other, cputime = TICK_NSEC * ticks;
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
account_system_index_time(p, cputime, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ);
} else if (user_tick) {
account_user_time(p, cputime);
- } else if (p == rq->idle) {
+ } else if (p == this_rq()->idle) {
account_idle_time(cputime);
} else if (p->flags & PF_VCPU) { /* System time or guest time */
account_guest_time(p, cputime);
@@ -392,14 +392,12 @@ static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
static void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks)
{
- struct rq *rq = this_rq();
-
- irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, rq, ticks);
+ irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, ticks);
}
#else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
static inline void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks) { }
static inline void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
- struct rq *rq, int nr_ticks) { }
+ int nr_ticks) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
/*
@@ -473,13 +471,12 @@ void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, u64 *ut, u64 *st)
void account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick)
{
u64 cputime, steal;
- struct rq *rq = this_rq();
if (vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu())
return;
if (sched_clock_irqtime) {
- irqtime_account_process_tick(p, user_tick, rq, 1);
+ irqtime_account_process_tick(p, user_tick, 1);
return;
}
@@ -493,7 +490,7 @@ void account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick)
if (user_tick)
account_user_time(p, cputime);
- else if ((p != rq->idle) || (irq_count() != HARDIRQ_OFFSET))
+ else if ((p != this_rq()->idle) || (irq_count() != HARDIRQ_OFFSET))
account_system_time(p, HARDIRQ_OFFSET, cputime);
else
account_idle_time(cputime);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-17 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-02 10:07 [PATCH 1/3] " Alex Shi
2020-01-02 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/cputime: code cleanup " Alex Shi
2020-01-06 15:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-01-07 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-09 13:30 ` Alex Shi
2020-01-02 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched/cputime: cleanup account_process_tick/account_idle_ticks Alex Shi
2020-01-06 14:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/cputime: move rq parameter in irqtime_account_process_tick Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-17 10:08 ` tip-bot2 for Alex Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=157925572173.396.14623531131441259192.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®