From: "tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86 <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: smp/core] smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the conditional function
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 19:45:22 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <157989512266.396.10318209206273887726.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200117090137.1205765-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
The following commit has been merged into the smp/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 5671d814dbd204b4ecc705045b5f1a647bff6f3b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5671d814dbd204b4ecc705045b5f1a647bff6f3b
Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
AuthorDate: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:01:35 +01:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 20:40:08 +01:00
smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the conditional function
Use a typdef for the conditional function instead defining it each time in
the function prototype.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200117090137.1205765-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de
---
include/linux/smp.h | 12 ++++++------
kernel/smp.c | 11 +++++------
kernel/up.c | 11 +++++------
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
index 6fc856c..4734416 100644
--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/llist.h>
typedef void (*smp_call_func_t)(void *info);
+typedef bool (*smp_cond_func_t)(int cpu, void *info);
struct __call_single_data {
struct llist_node llist;
smp_call_func_t func;
@@ -49,13 +50,12 @@ void on_each_cpu_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, smp_call_func_t func,
* cond_func returns a positive value. This may include the local
* processor.
*/
-void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
- smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags);
+void on_each_cpu_cond(smp_cond_func_t cond_func, smp_call_func_t func,
+ void *info, bool wait, gfp_t gfp_flags);
-void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
- smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct cpumask *mask);
+void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(smp_cond_func_t cond_func, smp_call_func_t func,
+ void *info, bool wait, gfp_t gfp_flags,
+ const struct cpumask *mask);
int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd);
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 7dbcb40..c64044d 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -680,9 +680,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
* You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or
* from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
*/
-void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
- smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct cpumask *mask)
+void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(smp_cond_func_t cond_func, smp_call_func_t func,
+ void *info, bool wait, gfp_t gfp_flags,
+ const struct cpumask *mask)
{
cpumask_var_t cpus;
int cpu, ret;
@@ -714,9 +714,8 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond_mask);
-void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
- smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags)
+void on_each_cpu_cond(smp_cond_func_t cond_func, smp_call_func_t func,
+ void *info, bool wait, gfp_t gfp_flags)
{
on_each_cpu_cond_mask(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags,
cpu_online_mask);
diff --git a/kernel/up.c b/kernel/up.c
index 862b460..5c0d4f2 100644
--- a/kernel/up.c
+++ b/kernel/up.c
@@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
* Preemption is disabled here to make sure the cond_func is called under the
* same condtions in UP and SMP.
*/
-void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
- smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct cpumask *mask)
+void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(smp_cond_func_t cond_func, smp_call_func_t func,
+ void *info, bool wait, gfp_t gfp_flags,
+ const struct cpumask *mask)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -84,9 +84,8 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond_mask);
-void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
- smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags)
+void on_each_cpu_cond(smp_cond_func_t cond_func, smp_call_func_t func,
+ void *info, bool wait, gfp_t gfp_flags)
{
on_each_cpu_cond_mask(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags, NULL);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-24 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-17 9:01 [PATCH 0/3] smp: Avoid memory allocation in on_each_cpu_cond() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-17 9:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the conditional function Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-24 19:45 ` tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2020-01-17 9:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] smp: Add a smp_cond_func_t argument to smp_call_function_many() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-17 13:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-17 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-24 19:45 ` [tip: smp/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-27 8:39 ` [PATCH] smp: Remove superfluous cond_func check in smp_call_function_many_cond() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-28 14:46 ` [tip: smp/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-17 9:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] smp: Remove allocation mask from on_each_cpu_cond.*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-24 19:45 ` [tip: smp/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-17 15:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] smp: Avoid memory allocation in on_each_cpu_cond() Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=157989512266.396.10318209206273887726.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®