From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>
To: Dan Kegel <dkegel@ixiacom.com>
Cc: Geoff Gustafson <geoff@linux.co.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
sglass@us.ibm.com, cyeoh@au1.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:18:30 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15815.14470.953780.411641@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DC70FC3.6030707@ixiacom.com>
At 2002/11/4 16:24-0800 Dan Kegel writes:
>
> Anyone know what the relationship between the LTP and LSB Posix
> compliance tests are?
The emphasis on what the test suites are trying to achieve does differ
- eg the LSB doesn't have endurance type tests and concentrates more
on writing tests which can be used for certification purposes. And of
course the LSB test suites only cover the areas that the LSB spec
requires.
> Were they both originally derived from the OpenGroup Posix compliance tests?
I don't think the LTP were tests derived from the OpenGroup (though
I'm not that familiar with them).
Chris
--
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-05 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-04 23:29 Dan Kegel
2002-11-05 0:04 ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-05 0:08 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-05 15:44 ` Nathan Straz
2002-11-05 0:24 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-05 3:18 ` Christopher Yeoh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-05 18:24 Stephanie Glass
2002-11-05 19:05 ` Rusty Lynch
2002-11-05 15:49 Stephanie Glass
2002-11-05 16:43 ` Rusty Lynch
2002-11-04 22:48 Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-04 22:58 ` Larry McVoy
2002-11-04 23:17 ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-04 23:57 ` Christopher Yeoh
2002-11-05 0:44 ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-05 2:26 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-11-05 3:35 ` Christopher Yeoh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15815.14470.953780.411641@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=cyeoh@samba.org \
--cc=cyeoh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=dkegel@ixiacom.com \
--cc=geoff@linux.co.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sglass@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®