mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Remove bogus 64-bit synth_event_trace() vararg assumption
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:23:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1581542611.25773.7.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212160859.705723d2@gandalf.local.home>

Hi Steve,

On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 16:08 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:13:02 -0600
> Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The vararg code in synth_event_trace() assumed the args were 64 bit
> > which is not the case on 32-bit systems.  Just use long which
> > should
> > work on every system.
> > 
> > Also remove all the u64 casts from the synth event test module,
> > which
> > also cause compile warnings on 32-bit compiles.
> > 
> > This fixes the bug reported by the kernel test robot/Rong Chen as
> > reported here:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200212113444.GS12867@shao2-debian/
> > 
> > With this commit, the lkp-tests tests now pass, as do the
> > synth/kprobe
> > event test modules and selftests on x86_64.
> 
> Did you test this on 32 bit? I just ran it on a 32 bit kernel, and I
> get this in the tracing output:

I did run it through the 32-bit lkp-tests, but couldn't figure out how
to get a shell to look at the output.

It looks like the output is fine, just some (null)s being printed that
shouldn't be.  I'll look into it..

Tom

> 
>         modprobe-1731  [003] ....   919.039758: gen_synth_test:
> next_pid_field=777(null)next_comm_field=hula hoops ts_ns=1000000
> ts_ms=1000 cpu=3(null)my_string_field=thneed my_int_field=598(null)
>         modprobe-1731  [003] ....   919.039904: empty_synth_test:
> next_pid_field=777(null)next_comm_field=tiddlywinks ts_ns=1000000
> ts_ms=1000 cpu=3(null)my_string_field=thneed_2.0
> my_int_field=399(null)
>         modprobe-1731  [003] ....   919.040055: create_synth_test:
> next_pid_field=777(null)next_comm_field=tiddlywinks ts_ns=1000000
> ts_ms=1000 cpu=3(null)my_string_field=thneed my_int_field=398(null)
>         modprobe-1731  [003] ....   919.040055: gen_synth_test:
> next_pid_field=777(null)next_comm_field=slinky ts_ns=1000000
> ts_ms=1000 cpu=3(null)my_string_field=thneed_2.01
> my_int_field=395(null)
>         modprobe-1731  [003] ....   919.040056: gen_synth_test:
> next_pid_field=777(null)next_comm_field=silly putty ts_ns=1000000
> ts_ms=1000 cpu=3(null)my_string_field=thneed_9
> my_int_field=3999(null)
>         modprobe-1731  [003] ....   919.040057: create_synth_test:
> next_pid_field=444(null)next_comm_field=clackers ts_ns=1000000
> ts_ms=1000 cpu=3(null)my_string_field=Thneed my_int_field=999(null)
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> > 
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> >  kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c    |  6 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c
> > b/kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c
> > index 4aefe003cb7c..f0e14106048c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c
> > @@ -111,11 +111,11 @@ static int __init test_gen_synth_cmd(void)
> >  	/* Create some bogus values just for testing */
> >  
> >  	vals[0] = 777;			/* next_pid_field */
> > -	vals[1] = (u64)"hula hoops";	/* next_comm_field */
> > +	vals[1] = (long)"hula hoops";	/* next_comm_field */
> >  	vals[2] = 1000000;		/* ts_ns */
> >  	vals[3] = 1000;			/* ts_ms */
> >  	vals[4] = smp_processor_id();	/* cpu */
> > -	vals[5] = (u64)"thneed";	/* my_string_field */
> > +	vals[5] = (long)"thneed";	/* my_string_field */
> >  	vals[6] = 598;			/* my_int_field */
> >  
> >  	/* Now generate a gen_synth_test event */
> > @@ -218,11 +218,11 @@ static int __init
> > test_empty_synth_event(void)
> >  	/* Create some bogus values just for testing */
> >  
> >  	vals[0] = 777;			/* next_pid_field */
> > -	vals[1] = (u64)"tiddlywinks";	/* next_comm_field */
> > +	vals[1] = (long)"tiddlywinks";	/* next_comm_field
> > */
> >  	vals[2] = 1000000;		/* ts_ns */
> >  	vals[3] = 1000;			/* ts_ms */
> >  	vals[4] = smp_processor_id();	/* cpu */
> > -	vals[5] = (u64)"thneed_2.0";	/* my_string_field */
> > +	vals[5] = (long)"thneed_2.0";	/* my_string_field */
> >  	vals[6] = 399;			/* my_int_field */
> >  
> >  	/* Now trace an empty_synth_test event */
> > @@ -290,11 +290,11 @@ static int __init
> > test_create_synth_event(void)
> >  	/* Create some bogus values just for testing */
> >  
> >  	vals[0] = 777;			/* next_pid_field */
> > -	vals[1] = (u64)"tiddlywinks";	/* next_comm_field */
> > +	vals[1] = (long)"tiddlywinks";	/* next_comm_field
> > */
> >  	vals[2] = 1000000;		/* ts_ns */
> >  	vals[3] = 1000;			/* ts_ms */
> >  	vals[4] = smp_processor_id();	/* cpu */
> > -	vals[5] = (u64)"thneed";	/* my_string_field */
> > +	vals[5] = (long)"thneed";	/* my_string_field */
> >  	vals[6] = 398;			/* my_int_field */
> >  
> >  	/* Now generate a create_synth_test event */
> > @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int __init test_add_next_synth_val(void)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> >  	/* next_comm_field */
> > -	ret = synth_event_add_next_val((u64)"slinky",
> > &trace_state);
> > +	ret = synth_event_add_next_val((long)"slinky",
> > &trace_state);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int __init test_add_next_synth_val(void)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> >  	/* my_string_field */
> > -	ret = synth_event_add_next_val((u64)"thneed_2.01",
> > &trace_state);
> > +	ret = synth_event_add_next_val((long)"thneed_2.01",
> > &trace_state);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > @@ -396,12 +396,12 @@ static int __init test_add_synth_val(void)
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > -	ret = synth_event_add_val("next_comm_field", (u64)"silly
> > putty",
> > +	ret = synth_event_add_val("next_comm_field", (long)"silly
> > putty",
> >  				  &trace_state);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > -	ret = synth_event_add_val("my_string_field",
> > (u64)"thneed_9",
> > +	ret = synth_event_add_val("my_string_field",
> > (long)"thneed_9",
> >  				  &trace_state);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto out;
> > @@ -424,11 +424,11 @@ static int __init
> > test_trace_synth_event(void)
> >  	/* Trace some bogus values just for testing */
> >  	ret = synth_event_trace(create_synth_test, 7,	/*
> > number of values */
> >  				444,			/*
> > next_pid_field */
> > -				(u64)"clackers",	/*
> > next_comm_field */
> > +				"clackers",		/*
> > next_comm_field */
> >  				1000000,		/* ts_ns
> > */
> >  				1000,			/*
> > ts_ms */
> >  				smp_processor_id(),	/* cpu
> > */
> > -				(u64)"Thneed",		/*
> > my_string_field */
> > +				"Thneed",		/*
> > my_string_field */
> >  				999);			/*
> > my_int_field */
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> > b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> > index 483b3fd1094f..b8dd28f546d8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> > @@ -1887,12 +1887,12 @@ int synth_event_trace(struct
> > trace_event_file *file, unsigned int n_vals, ...)
> >  
> >  	va_start(args, n_vals);
> >  	for (i = 0, n_u64 = 0; i < state.event->n_fields; i++) {
> > -		u64 val;
> > +		long val;
> >  
> > -		val = va_arg(args, u64);
> > +		val = va_arg(args, long);
> >  
> >  		if (state.event->fields[i]->is_string) {
> > -			char *str_val = (char *)(long)val;
> > +			char *str_val = (char *)val;
> >  			char *str_field = (char *)&state.entry-
> > >fields[n_u64];
> >  
> >  			strscpy(str_field, str_val,
> > STR_VAR_LEN_MAX);
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2020-02-12 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-12 20:13 Tom Zanussi
2020-02-12 21:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 21:23   ` Tom Zanussi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1581542611.25773.7.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=tzanussi@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome