mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] e1000e: fix pci device enable counter balance
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:07:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1582328.fuzuCUZWBa@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo5Cfi0KbOqDr4TfnzjWFy7V-oi0bOY-vf8Y16_RPtEGdQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday, January 28, 2013 04:09:38 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Rafael]
> 
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> <khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote:
> > __e1000_shutdown() calls pci_disable_device() at the end, thus __e1000_resume()
> > should call pci_enable_device_mem() to keep enable counter in balance.
> >
> > Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133
> > ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
> > Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> > Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c |    7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > index 2853c11..6bce796 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > @@ -5598,6 +5598,13 @@ static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >         pci_restore_state(pdev);
> >         pci_save_state(pdev);
> >
> > +       err = pci_enable_device_mem(pdev);
> > +       if (err) {
> > +               dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > +                       "Cannot re-enable PCI device after suspend.\n");
> > +               return err;
> > +       }
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> Seems right to me, and the other users I looked at (igb, azx,
> virtio_pci) call pci_disable_device() in .suspend() and call
> pci_enable_device() in .resume() as you propose to do here.
> 
> I assume the e1000 folks will handle this patch (and the previous one).
> 

OK, so this one looks like a genuine fix to me.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Thanks,
Rafael


> > +
> >         e1000e_set_interrupt_capability(adapter);
> >         if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> >                 err = e1000_request_irq(adapter);
> >
> > --
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-31  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-18 11:42 [PATCH 0/5] pci/e1000e: return runtime-pm back to work Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-01-18 11:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] e1000e: fix resuming from runtime-suspend Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-01-28 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29  1:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29  6:32       ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-01-29 12:00         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31  1:18         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31  7:05           ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-01-31  1:23   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] e1000e: fix pci device enable counter balance Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-01-28 23:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29  0:31     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29  6:45       ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-01-31  1:07     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-01-18 11:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI: revert preparing for wakeup in runtime-suspend finalization Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-01-28 23:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29  1:15     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29  7:04       ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-01-29 11:55         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31  1:13           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-02 12:12             ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-02-02 20:58               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-02 22:59                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 10:14                   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-02-03 12:57                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 23:03               ` David Airlie
2013-02-03 23:19               ` David Airlie
2013-02-03 23:31                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 11:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI: don't touch enable_cnt in pci_device_shutdown() Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-01-18 16:16   ` Don Dutile
2013-01-28 23:40   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 23:44     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29  2:47       ` Khalid Aziz
2013-01-18 11:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI: catch enable-counter underflows Konstantin Khlebnikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1582328.fuzuCUZWBa@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®