From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D22C43331 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0703F2073B for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730200AbgC3NLb (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:11:31 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:60558 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730070AbgC3NLb (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:11:31 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 26A80442C2BD11412B18; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:11:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from use12-sp2.huawei.com (10.67.189.174) by DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:11:12 +0800 From: Xiaoming Ni To: , , CC: , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2] mtd:clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad blocks repeatedly Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:11:09 +0800 Message-ID: <1585573869-81863-1-git-send-email-nixiaoming@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.5.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.67.189.174] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The function call process is as follows: mtd_blktrans_work() while (1) do_blktrans_request() mtdblock_writesect() do_cached_write() write_cached_data() /*if cache_state is STATE_DIRTY*/ erase_write() write_cached_data() returns failure without modifying cache_state and cache_offset. So when do_cached_write() is called again, write_cached_data() will be called again to perform erase_write() on the same cache_offset. But if this cache_offset points to a bad block, erase_write() will always return -EIO. Writing to this mtdblk is equivalent to losing the current data, and repeatedly writing to the bad block. Repeatedly writing a bad block has no real benefits, but brings some negative effects: 1 Lost subsequent data 2 Loss of flash device life 3 erase_write() bad blocks are very time-consuming. For example: the function do_erase_oneblock() in chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c or chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c may take more than 20 seconds to return Therefore, when erase_write() returns -EIO in write_cached_data(), clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad blocks repeatedly. Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal --- drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c index 078e0f6..32e52d8 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ static int write_cached_data (struct mtdblk_dev *mtdblk) ret = erase_write (mtd, mtdblk->cache_offset, mtdblk->cache_size, mtdblk->cache_data); - if (ret) - return ret; /* * Here we could arguably set the cache state to STATE_CLEAN. @@ -98,9 +96,14 @@ static int write_cached_data (struct mtdblk_dev *mtdblk) * be notified if this content is altered on the flash by other * means. Let's declare it empty and leave buffering tasks to * the buffer cache instead. + * + * If this cache_offset points to a bad block, data cannot be + * written to the device. Clear cache_state to avoid writing to + * bad blocks repeatedly. */ - mtdblk->cache_state = STATE_EMPTY; - return 0; + if (ret == 0 || ret == -EIO) + mtdblk->cache_state = STATE_EMPTY; + return ret; } -- 1.8.5.6