From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net, bjornw@axis.com,
davidm@hpl.hp.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, ralf@gnu.org,
mkp@mkp.net, willy@debian.org, anton@samba.org, gniibe@m17n.org,
kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp, Jeff Dike <jdike@karaya.com>
Subject: Re: Userspace Test Framework for module loader porting
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:38:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15897.56108.201340.229554@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030106022803.902F82C0E2@lists.samba.org>
>>>>> On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 13:27:02 +1100, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> said:
Rusty> BTW, the change to use shared objects for modules is going to
Rusty> be a 2.7 thing: after 10 architectures, MIPS toolchain issues
Rusty> made it non-trivial. So the current stuff is what is going
Rusty> to be there for 2.6, so no point waiting 8)
What about all the problems that Richard Henderson pointed out with
the original in-kernel module loader? Were those solved? My gut
feeling is that we really want shared objects for kernel modules on
ia64 (and probably alpha?).
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-06 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-06 2:27 Rusty Russell
2003-01-06 19:38 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-01-06 22:41 ` Richard Henderson
2003-01-07 0:37 ` David Mosberger
2003-01-08 11:44 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-11 1:47 ` David Mosberger
2003-01-13 0:27 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-13 13:20 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-01-14 0:01 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-24 18:23 ` return-type for search_extable() David Mosberger
2003-01-28 4:53 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-28 6:14 ` David Mosberger
2003-01-08 11:21 ` Userspace Test Framework for module loader porting Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15897.56108.201340.229554@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=bjornw@axis.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gniibe@m17n.org \
--cc=jdike@karaya.com \
--cc=kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@mkp.net \
--cc=ralf@gnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®