From: "tip-bot2 for Gustavo A. R. Silva" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86 <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:44:15 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158991385502.17951.1325330133750697343.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507192141.GA16183@embeddedor>
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 04f5c362ec6d3ff0e14f1c05230b550da7f528a4
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/04f5c362ec6d3ff0e14f1c05230b550da7f528a4
Author: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 07 May 2020 14:21:41 -05:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 19 May 2020 20:34:14 +02:00
sched/fair: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200507192141.GA16183@embeddedor
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 44b0c8e..01f94cf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ struct numa_group {
* more by CPU use than by memory faults.
*/
unsigned long *faults_cpu;
- unsigned long faults[0];
+ unsigned long faults[];
};
/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 21416b3..2bd2a22 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1462,7 +1462,7 @@ struct sched_group {
* by attaching extra space to the end of the structure,
* depending on how many CPUs the kernel has booted up with)
*/
- unsigned long cpumask[0];
+ unsigned long cpumask[];
};
static inline struct cpumask *sched_group_span(struct sched_group *sg)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-07 19:21 [PATCH] " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-05-19 18:44 ` tip-bot2 for Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158991385502.17951.1325330133750697343.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®