From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
To: Ross Biro <rossb@google.com>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, andre@linux-ide.org,
marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] Fix for Promise PIO Lockup
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:21:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15909.28249.617353.381378@harpo.it.uu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E2368CF.6050608@google.com>
Ross Biro writes:
> Newer kernels will lock up when a drive command (SMART, hdparm -I, etc.)
> is issued to a drive connected to a Promise 20265 or 20267 controller
> while the controller is in DMA mode. The problem appears to be that
> tune_chipset incorrectly clears the high PIO bit thinking that it is a
> "PIO force on" bit. The documentation I have access to does not seem to
> mention a PIO force bit. Not changing that bit seems to fix the problem
> with drive commands on a promise controller.
>
> The documentation I have also says the values for the TB and TC
> variables should be the same for all UDMA modes and they are not.
> However the driver seems to work anyway, so I left them the way they are.
>
> To reproduce this problem make sure your drive is set to a DMA mode, eg
> hdparm -X 67 and then issue a drive command, e.g. hdparm -I.
I have tried to reproduce this problem according to your description
above, but neither my 20269 (with "new" driver) nor my 20267 (with
"old" driver) hangs. I checked with kernels 2.5.58 and 2.4.21-pre3.
Maybe something else is needed for the hang to occur?
/Mikael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-15 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-14 1:33 Ross Biro
2003-01-15 14:21 ` Mikael Pettersson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15909.28249.617353.381378@harpo.it.uu.se \
--to=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=rossb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®