From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 14:10:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593450.1tg6AZy8cc@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400167727-20233-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 06:28:46 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> From: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
>
> Now that the x86 dynamic IRQ allocation problem has been resolved with
> commmit 62a08ae2a576 (genirq: x86: Ensure that dynamic irq allocation does
> not conflict), we can add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID to the pinctrl driver.
>
> This makes the driver to work on Asus T100 where it is needed for several
> things like ACPI GPIO events and SD card detection.
>
> References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68291
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
And I think this is pinctrl material really.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 1 +
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> index 24e49a52cefb..c314d709e5a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_lpss_device_ids[] = {
> { "80860F14", (unsigned long)&byt_sdio_dev_desc },
> { "80860F41", (unsigned long)&byt_i2c_dev_desc },
> { "INT33B2", },
> + { "INT33FC", },
>
> { "INT3430", (unsigned long)&lpt_dev_desc },
> { "INT3431", (unsigned long)&lpt_dev_desc },
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> index 6e8301f77187..447f1dc25ea6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> @@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops byt_gpio_pm_ops = {
>
> static const struct acpi_device_id byt_gpio_acpi_match[] = {
> { "INT33B2", 0 },
> + { "INT33FC", 0 },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, byt_gpio_acpi_match);
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-15 15:28 Mika Westerberg
2014-05-15 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Register GPIO chip after chip->to_irq is set Mika Westerberg
2014-05-22 21:47 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-16 12:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-05-16 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID Mika Westerberg
2014-05-22 21:50 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-23 7:18 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1593450.1tg6AZy8cc@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®