From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932607AbcKHLl5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 8 Nov 2016 06:41:57 -0500
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.75]:59006 "EHLO
        mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932185AbcKHLlJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 8 Nov 2016 06:41:09 -0500
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: only enable sys_pkey* when ARCH_HAS_PKEYS
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 12:39:28 +0100
Message-ID: <1596342.1rV5HksyDO@wuerfel>
User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-34-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20161108093042.GC3528@osiris>
References: <1477958904-9903-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20161104234459.GA18760@remoulade> <20161108093042.GC3528@osiris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3w/eauZ72y4V3Nnmr9CwpbzzqkWIrdaKTKijSIMrDwrwczd9ot2
 gUh8tn8k6e50VpvxwKwOaQnpzhJJJLo3G0zcA47RxUd6J4wNoOOTwIx951qzPaiwP9D3YAz
 Aa87s27ohVZZdPyFFLnx5K7GiaoRAev0+KLUG+FqKfLpDIq+oL93VLlShidB58PhEs6x5RX
 UlAUIkqoF010l2+WvGKQg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:onsrVuQLNG0=:SkBmoLPZMXsKZKu9f2d3fX
 WWFXwxi98508kl5MJntPy+cDu0YikdZiAJU8iHTDVEEOCCCALW9XvzY/7omwo45LrcdqNgxxV
 DTLESiHI8DM3WR90PiqpI/FBoiABG25A/RYSaBi8+him6O8PCsdjsOrlnabccziGS9sz8DjBT
 svFTzf/P2B9Qz4VCKPDyZ/N3JMjX0akrKr/TnFavwv1uBFm2r+9m0gmeiYGLy5eI+rK6P24sf
 GsnFUrrbQX2TJgETOGV7dr8XQn4jbyFk6PGRF3jUNMAplwC73SkedwOiJRRRiYGabAAGRhrwS
 IqBblnxPzvnKf94/WWrBfBiLm5/iAsL2p00I2DnLek/rSys2mGwQrP3HEtDsxcnPOLf8tFxgL
 3KfxRcy4DKW895rvkRdccw9dHMTKiynSxPrZlcRCEunarj3ajB4HkT9/VQZw/jQHbeiSx54W7
 4WpAoCOCY0C7wGulBMKcmIh0pIm7/cpzx+g/tzCAXV1z+UDd3yFWHUTHMFbAOj8NzxmgDOtND
 u+yafAY2kC61+9sP85YiCpu37nrUgFtqPvte0YC1jUMOb0/XzDTNxQDn4FOL9Ngbxu/WM3qWN
 6vaD9P/pRUQny2VEjTf7/wGW7grynX9+jWYKKkWHzL9avb+dnG3l7G5oLoj4xKEtkjyRLtGGI
 q5Hd0JdAp83kbYAEpsqnFmXSeekBKXKdycUqWZSQsvg6q26Lo9TW0EhNi0rFYpKmFnpSyvZGX
 KnP7PlKjX3kfLquT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 10:30:42 AM CET Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Three architectures (parisc, powerpc, s390) decided to ignore the system
> calls completely, but still have the pkey code linked into the kernel
> image.

Wouldn't it actually make sense to hook this up to the storage keys
in the s390 page tables?

	Arnd