[PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation

[Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>]

The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses" instead
of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
aforementioned wording.

Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
---
 Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing identical callback
 mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
 handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
 
-Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
+Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
 hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
 be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
 interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
-- 
2.9.3