mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: keys: Use kvfree_sensitive in a few places
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:04:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1599836664.4041.21.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200911114400.82207-1-alex.dewar90@gmail.com>

On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 12:44 +0100, Alex Dewar wrote:
> In big_key.c, there are a few places where memzero_explicit + kvfree
> is used. It is better to use kvfree_sensitive instead, which is more
> readable and also prevents the compiler from eliding the call to
> memzero_explicit. Fix this.

That last bit is untrue: the compiler can't elide memzero_explicit ...
that's why it has the explicit suffix.

The original problem was a lot of people do memset(.., 0, ..); kfree()
which the compiler can elide if it understands the memory is going out
of scope.  Or the even more problematic memset(..., 0, ...) on a stack
variable before it goes out of scope.

We can argue about readability but there's no secret leak here.

James


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-11 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-11 11:44 Alex Dewar
2020-09-11 15:04 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2020-09-11 16:05 ` Denis Efremov
2020-09-11 16:09   ` Alex Dewar
2020-09-14 18:05   ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1599836664.4041.21.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=alex.dewar90@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®