Re: [PATCH] dma/pool: eliminate alloc_pages warning in atomic_pool_expand

[Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>]

On 12/2/25 9:47AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2025-12-02 3:28 pm, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>> atomic_pool_expand iterately tries the allocation while decrementing the
> 
> "iteratively"?

Oops.

> 
>> page order. There is no need to issue a warning if an attempted
>> allocation fails.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/dma/pool.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/dma/pool.c b/kernel/dma/pool.c
>> index ee45dee33d49..26392badc36b 100644
>> --- a/kernel/dma/pool.c
>> +++ b/kernel/dma/pool.c
>> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int atomic_pool_expand(struct gen_pool *pool, 
>> size_t pool_size,
>>               page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, 1 << order,
>>                                order, false);
>>           if (!page)
>> -            page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
>> +            page = alloc_pages(gfp | __GFP_NOWARN, order);
> 
> Might be nice to keep some kind of warning if we entirely fail all the 
> way down to order 0, although I guess if it matters it would show up via 
> the warning on dma_alloc_from_pool() failure soon enough anyway...
> 
> Either way it certainly makes sense in general;
> 
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

Thanks

> 
>>       } while (!page && order-- > 0);
>>       if (!page)
>>           goto out;
>