From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751723AbWD1TYk (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:24:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751703AbWD1TYk (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:24:40 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.192]:6750 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751432AbWD1TYk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:24:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OM3q6BPiSyJYYJMiu9LoA/+rY/p6K9C4VIE0Mxxd4r0ke9OolAUt2XFDD+n5RyTtfXYu0n5+3I7qshyCfIYWs4TFqP5Z9CbQSN+ShhRxae8LlDxHXyY981hQE5EpWCMDNS+30TGM94sgvTG/1Am6sRwcEMli4ybQHX0VLr5tTnI= Message-ID: <15ddcffd0604281224i4308b08fs93f9ebaf7e9a16b3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:24:39 +0200 From: "Or Gerlitz" To: "Pekka J Enberg" Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: possible bug in kmem_cache related code Cc: "Christoph Lameter" , "Andrew Morton" , open-iscsi@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <84144f020604270419s10696877he2ec27ae6d52e486@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/28/06, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > On 4/27/06, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > > > With 2.6.17-rc3 I'm running into something which seems as a bug related > > > > to kmem_cache. Doing some allocations/deallocations from a kmem_cache and > > > > later attempting to destroy it yields the following message and trace > On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > Tested on 2.6.16.7 and works ok. Christoph, could this be related to > > > the cache draining patches that went in 2.6.17-rc1? > I can't reproduce this with Linus' git head on User-mode Linux running on > UP i386. Or, can you reproduce this at will? Any local modifications? Can > we see your .config, please. Yes, i can reproduce this at will, no local modifications, my system is amd dual x86_64, i have attached my .config to the first email of this thread, and also mentioned that some CONFIG_DEBUG_ options are set, including one related to slab debugging. Also, by "User mode Linux" you mean linux kernel that runs as a user process on your system? Or. Or.