From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 838CD4314B9 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 10:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783507827; cv=none; b=sQbEKUzFffSmWCq1ZakbeqWse2sjV0BdMLc6/RMBQXJI9Qex8oFHaLdZKDKiMjYKTUfDKbi/jqs+Vgb/8oy+9xS7QrGBPzw3kCTxsoGuepH07kUKvtGUlUwKQ/qKsPvIZJQcYEc6XftiakuqAaq0TotUCf4an7qq867pg9ID2Pc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783507827; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XbtrJUUeM3xNHOoBDhocSvoqSRxhQJf5NIcQJ2vvppI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Jj49R2YBlQPl0qgD/BvrXb3+zXOp78SqKIUXWo8oqAbrEDDLY+PsYRVZPG9Q4qCy7uokoOwRqpMtb40cVhU1UDvpImfbgJWYScVT8G+EHO4Sz+sEPmr9toYsuABcqLOciVp6JRox7J8KptSfMFB1WXK+CP6f9UrSDTu/9ba+N+4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=QqthG9ND; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=QyXGLIXe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="QqthG9ND"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="QyXGLIXe" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1783507813; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7RthwfiaiuQwFULsU9rLR+4p2hP6BkmVyKgFOz4tjmA=; b=QqthG9ND+/rwaf1cjppmLex2EYwg0ZZka8lr1sZ9MZqqF25l9xr+4Ryglr4dBUU2r57hr0 CmKgfd2dnH0y2ssVGOdJWjxHtQg/CeMw6aQ6G/huf2dadQRsxGmXsSfytd+a3pcSs/h3Z2 F0o6MxX0ZGQEF1vNxbXDCka4d9a2uMM= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-681-decfzzc_OSiMPibnbWO6Ng-1; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 06:50:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: decfzzc_OSiMPibnbWO6Ng-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: decfzzc_OSiMPibnbWO6Ng_1783507811 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-493c20d0468so7259805e9.1 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 03:50:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1783507811; x=1784112611; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:content-language :from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=7RthwfiaiuQwFULsU9rLR+4p2hP6BkmVyKgFOz4tjmA=; b=QyXGLIXegC9GU8f+7pf9mscNhjhpghkLNmZwWQ8FttE9MXp9UZfvHghK3670O3CIEu KzUnbutFlOEcFKIGWpz+apyBYVZhDx8/SF5LqhmyOomOTjIkerJQmlBdJ6DNh5hvjWfg F9mK9gOYZwv5xqLSo1hIb7UG4W+j2Y9QfKpvglZdzziSjPVy1hLsZkivX5o0/ZZ0TLmd bD9HGpBnubzcwDZ54p/kMfzXV9VU1EaX9lDX3IlrkF1fiE7PMfR9lQbEhzZ905iIB5U8 7H3U2u4Gw74t1vyCgFWa9PEGnvLiV2mkCvSKK/gH+dvF3mJNM0J03Ojp9BEkVaBGRmVJ Qb5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1783507811; x=1784112611; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:content-language :from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=7RthwfiaiuQwFULsU9rLR+4p2hP6BkmVyKgFOz4tjmA=; b=kP/ZSgfpMMCbjaWp8W0gK5HYmDA08Oi6JkTh/M5S05yaytnYi+hsrhuIce5O7rV2yy wDuZpIaQYE22jNp9umRv8ASs9n4baetAzdnnNmCaNHo7yJLqgtNejTFssvK2VKy7Ukf0 6FYyCcRJ3wHo6U8doFdYYbeU0gGLwtVtMLJcid1Z1SsObybpdWFA037K8IVDlY2tRFVw FfqaqErgXH74TiMbqoQvOt4Vm92dZ2bnG/qouKRif+Dli78XXNlWholkNbSDJ48Uz4iu JnmV5XCJC42DF/SfVQxlEQqJ4T7J7p02CFfpaqfnmN8Ylh8nAqu0veIDmYetKO+9WspA Orlg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RqzZTYAeWcYCVHYVNwC5eeC0VSbvldXtdCO9ehGNWDpTJC0gySjRna81IVOr5wDLP5wNDGt90RVBZ6pQK8=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxpf/jbJYBgd9ewDZErGUv4sz3+bBiUbOTOU4Ys9DDB0aTrYDhJ 55eHUMj7TkA8qKFOUYUCh767KqZ6bSKxpoMvfEeJorin0YaU8HQZ2wKhnHilb9LDyw/Oufr79sL 35wUHrH5GtkjlN4iskh6llKtFE7DAyLK4N2rRmE/WtRO6pomOoHgacN6ob4Cxa3Cx9A== X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7ckIX3ap8F+NKsxQJ1JTc50kiTK0Ow5IQtp0fc9YkLwzqtNrDMg4sYUvyXkpCba 2qbkocyYkrJYtaykIYVMZc/GcLaviG/pSpjdBBWyM7o+T6GTne633Pq0Flv7rv2EnQ1HY8MWetY C9j/NN/aSjvvCoMp3nxBY6J6velq7c9bSSbyKbx2LIYhaLsc5WilPy9F/tO3WSqvzsWB+8Zu5NE ZWBqpZj3XXs+WQt+/G/4yLjg8seoQvIjSN14PKhJ08o9AikK436fvl6eAu/kStN1lqSLRWqr3Du LuHLh2k6cw4T87QS1P9tqeiB7Huhb6GDsLdP8DE/qv3hUuI1bQ6ZxreJBwwsxcnUuE04CzVR0Iv GpjUdjYoHo3zOmmfdVouQEb0+r4IxZtUyD1YhY2bLysLrZqebh53JxZNRM+Nwd6hHwub+L3JVHu dBevDU8nIJVbaM X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b92:b0:493:e892:f03c with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-493e892f05amr3891665e9.10.1783507811115; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 03:50:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b92:b0:493:e892:f03c with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-493e892f05amr3891245e9.10.1783507810639; Wed, 08 Jul 2026 03:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a0d:3344:5521:6b10:58fd:68f:7756:389d? ([2a0d:3344:5521:6b10:58fd:68f:7756:389d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-493e0f40912sm123922735e9.4.2026.07.08.03.50.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Jul 2026 03:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <15e72c82-ca99-481b-bd53-744fabd503b0@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:50:07 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net: devmem: allow rx-buf-size > PAGE_SIZE per dmabuf binding To: Mina Almasry , Bobby Eshleman Cc: Donald Hunter , Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , Gerd Hoffmann , Vivek Kasireddy , Sumit Semwal , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , Shuah Khan , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, razor@blackwall.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, matttbe@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com, dw@davidwei.uk, Joe Damato , Bobby Eshleman References: <20260701-tcpdm-large-niovs-v4-0-ca4654f37570@meta.com> <20260701-tcpdm-large-niovs-v4-1-ca4654f37570@meta.com> From: Paolo Abeni Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 7/7/26 10:36 PM, Mina Almasry wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 12:22 PM Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> >> From: Bobby Eshleman >> >> Every devmem dmabuf binding today hands the page_pool PAGE_SIZE niovs. >> This caps a single RX descriptor at PAGE_SIZE, burning CPU on buffer >> churn for large flows. >> >> Add a bind-time netlink attribute, NETDEV_A_DMABUF_RX_BUF_SIZE, that >> lets userspace request a larger niov size. The value must be a power of >> two >= PAGE_SIZE. >> >> Measurements >> ------------ Checkpatch complains about this separator usage: ERROR: Invalid commit separator - some tools may have problems applying this #15: ------------ Please replace or remove it in the next revision >> @@ -90,16 +90,17 @@ net_devmem_alloc_dmabuf(struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding) >> struct dmabuf_genpool_chunk_owner *owner; >> unsigned long dma_addr; >> struct net_iov *niov; >> - ssize_t offset; >> - ssize_t index; >> + size_t offset; >> + size_t index; >> > > nit: I would keep this signed. Some of the most frustrating issues I > ran into is some of the underflowing and then passing a > check or > something. Although if the LLM is not complaining about this > particular case, there is probably no issue with it. I also notice a > lot of existing code that deals with indexes and offsets goes for > signed. At very least the above change should go in a separate patch, as is quite unrelated from the rest. /P