From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB94C43461 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532E020809 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728213AbgIPSre (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:47:34 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:12762 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727957AbgIPSrY (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:47:24 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 773A81CA08F761B2D03B; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:50:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.165.24) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:50:01 +0800 From: Qi Liu To: , , CC: , Subject: [PATCH V2 RESEND] perf stat: Fix the ratio comments of miss-events Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:48:51 +0800 Message-ID: <1600253331-10535-1-git-send-email-liuqi115@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.67.165.24] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Perf stat displays miss ratio of L1-dcache, L1-icache, dTLB cache, iTLB cache and LL-cache. Take L1-dcache for example, miss ratio is caculated as "L1-dcache-load-misses/L1-dcache-loads". So "of all L1-dcache hits" is unsuitable to describe it, and "of all L1-dcache accesses" seems better. The comments of L1-icache, dTLB cache, iTLB cache and LL-cache are fixed in the same way. Signed-off-by: Qi Liu Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen --- tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c index e1ba6c1..ee3c404 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static void print_l1_dcache_misses(struct perf_stat_config *config, color = get_ratio_color(GRC_CACHE_MISSES, ratio); - out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all L1-dcache hits", ratio); + out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all L1-dcache accesses", ratio); } static void print_l1_icache_misses(struct perf_stat_config *config, @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static void print_l1_icache_misses(struct perf_stat_config *config, ratio = avg / total * 100.0; color = get_ratio_color(GRC_CACHE_MISSES, ratio); - out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all L1-icache hits", ratio); + out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all L1-icache accesses", ratio); } static void print_dtlb_cache_misses(struct perf_stat_config *config, @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static void print_dtlb_cache_misses(struct perf_stat_config *config, ratio = avg / total * 100.0; color = get_ratio_color(GRC_CACHE_MISSES, ratio); - out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all dTLB cache hits", ratio); + out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all dTLB cache accesses", ratio); } static void print_itlb_cache_misses(struct perf_stat_config *config, @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static void print_itlb_cache_misses(struct perf_stat_config *config, ratio = avg / total * 100.0; color = get_ratio_color(GRC_CACHE_MISSES, ratio); - out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all iTLB cache hits", ratio); + out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all iTLB cache accesses", ratio); } static void print_ll_cache_misses(struct perf_stat_config *config, @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static void print_ll_cache_misses(struct perf_stat_config *config, ratio = avg / total * 100.0; color = get_ratio_color(GRC_CACHE_MISSES, ratio); - out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all LL-cache hits", ratio); + out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all LL-cache accesses", ratio); } /* @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ void perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(struct perf_stat_config *config, if (runtime_stat_n(st, STAT_L1_DCACHE, ctx, cpu) != 0) print_l1_dcache_misses(config, cpu, evsel, avg, out, st); else - print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all L1-dcache hits", 0); + print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all L1-dcache accesses", 0); } else if ( evsel->core.attr.type == PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE && evsel->core.attr.config == ( PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_L1I | @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ void perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(struct perf_stat_config *config, if (runtime_stat_n(st, STAT_L1_ICACHE, ctx, cpu) != 0) print_l1_icache_misses(config, cpu, evsel, avg, out, st); else - print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all L1-icache hits", 0); + print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all L1-icache accesses", 0); } else if ( evsel->core.attr.type == PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE && evsel->core.attr.config == ( PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_DTLB | @@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ void perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(struct perf_stat_config *config, if (runtime_stat_n(st, STAT_DTLB_CACHE, ctx, cpu) != 0) print_dtlb_cache_misses(config, cpu, evsel, avg, out, st); else - print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all dTLB cache hits", 0); + print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all dTLB cache accesses", 0); } else if ( evsel->core.attr.type == PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE && evsel->core.attr.config == ( PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_ITLB | @@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ void perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(struct perf_stat_config *config, if (runtime_stat_n(st, STAT_ITLB_CACHE, ctx, cpu) != 0) print_itlb_cache_misses(config, cpu, evsel, avg, out, st); else - print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all iTLB cache hits", 0); + print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all iTLB cache accesses", 0); } else if ( evsel->core.attr.type == PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE && evsel->core.attr.config == ( PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_LL | @@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ void perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(struct perf_stat_config *config, if (runtime_stat_n(st, STAT_LL_CACHE, ctx, cpu) != 0) print_ll_cache_misses(config, cpu, evsel, avg, out, st); else - print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all LL-cache hits", 0); + print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all LL-cache accesses", 0); } else if (evsel__match(evsel, HARDWARE, HW_CACHE_MISSES)) { total = runtime_stat_avg(st, STAT_CACHEREFS, ctx, cpu); -- 2.8.1