From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263361AbTDGJ1t (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 05:27:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263364AbTDGJ1t (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 05:27:49 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:39323 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263361AbTDGJ1s (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 05:27:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16017.18242.544290.263300@charged.uio.no> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:39:14 +0200 To: Robert Love Cc: Andrew Morton , Trond Myklebust , felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5: NFS troubles In-Reply-To: <1049675270.753.166.camel@localhost> References: <1049630768.592.24.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> <20030406171855.6bd3552d.akpm@digeo.com> <1049675270.753.166.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Robert Love writes: > I have not yet figured out whether its the 2.5 kernel on the > client or the newly-upgraded Red Hat 9 on the server... but I > suspect the 2.5 kernel on the client. There is a problem with generic reads under 2.5. Now that I think I've got the resource management under control, I've started to look into it. Cheers, Trond