[tip: perf/core] perf/x86: Fix n_pair for cancelled txn

["tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>]

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     871a93b0aad65a7f44ee25f2d17932ef6d559850
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/871a93b0aad65a7f44ee25f2d17932ef6d559850
Author:        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:09:06 +02:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:18:17 +02:00

perf/x86: Fix n_pair for cancelled txn

Kan reported that n_metric gets corrupted for cancelled transactions;
a similar issue exists for n_pair for AMD's Large Increment thing.

The problem was confirmed and confirmed fixed by Kim using:

  sudo perf stat -e "{cycles,cycles,cycles,cycles}:D" -a sleep 10 &

  # should succeed:
  sudo perf stat -e "{fp_ret_sse_avx_ops.all}:D" -a workload

  # should fail:
  sudo perf stat -e "{fp_ret_sse_avx_ops.all,fp_ret_sse_avx_ops.all,cycles}:D" -a workload

  # previously failed, now succeeds with this patch:
  sudo perf stat -e "{fp_ret_sse_avx_ops.all}:D" -a workload

Fixes: 5738891229a2 ("perf/x86/amd: Add support for Large Increment per Cycle Events")
Reported-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005082516.GG2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c       | 6 +++++-
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index cb5cfef..a7248a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -1064,8 +1064,10 @@ static int collect_event(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	cpuc->event_list[n] = event;
-	if (is_counter_pair(&event->hw))
+	if (is_counter_pair(&event->hw)) {
 		cpuc->n_pair++;
+		cpuc->n_txn_pair++;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -2006,6 +2008,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu, unsigned int txn_flags)
 
 	perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
 	__this_cpu_write(cpu_hw_events.n_txn, 0);
+	__this_cpu_write(cpu_hw_events.n_txn_pair, 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2031,6 +2034,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
 	 */
 	__this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_added, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn));
 	__this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_events, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn));
+	__this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_pair, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn_pair));
 	perf_pmu_enable(pmu);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 3454424..93e56d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
 					     they've never been enabled yet */
 	int			n_txn;    /* the # last events in the below arrays;
 					     added in the current transaction */
+	int			n_txn_pair;
 	int			assign[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX]; /* event to counter assignment */
 	u64			tags[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];