From: "tip-bot2 for Paul E. McKenney" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: core/rcu] rcu: Reduce leaf fanout for strict RCU grace periods
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 06:35:23 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160222532326.7002.17818852493729855728.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: dc1269186bed3afc5a2018527516be84fe55d3e0
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/dc1269186bed3afc5a2018527516be84fe55d3e0
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:52:17 -07:00
Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:40:23 -07:00
rcu: Reduce leaf fanout for strict RCU grace periods
Because strict RCU grace periods will complete more quickly, they will
experience greater lock contention on each leaf rcu_node structure's
->lock. This commit therefore reduces the leaf fanout in order to reduce
this lock contention.
Note that this also has the effect of reducing the number of CPUs
supported to 16 in the case of CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=2 or 81 in the
case of CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=3. However, greater numbers of CPUs are
probably a bad idea when using CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y. Those
wishing to live dangerously are free to edit their kernel/rcu/Kconfig
files accordingly.
Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
index 0ebe15a..b71e21f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -135,10 +135,12 @@ config RCU_FANOUT
config RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
int "Tree-based hierarchical RCU leaf-level fanout value"
- range 2 64 if 64BIT
- range 2 32 if !64BIT
+ range 2 64 if 64BIT && !RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD
+ range 2 32 if !64BIT && !RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD
+ range 2 3 if RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD
depends on TREE_RCU && RCU_EXPERT
- default 16
+ default 16 if !RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD
+ default 2 if RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD
help
This option controls the leaf-level fanout of hierarchical
implementations of RCU, and allows trading off cache misses
reply other threads:[~2020-10-09 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160222532326.7002.17818852493729855728.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®