From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263194AbTDRS5J (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:57:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263212AbTDRS5J (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:57:09 -0400 Received: from palrel13.hp.com ([156.153.255.238]:51890 "EHLO palrel13.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263194AbTDRS5J (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:57:09 -0400 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16032.19793.17108.442072@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:09:05 -0700 To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] archs: vmlinux.lds.S unification In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kai> Does IA-64 still need to discard .comment, .note? (is SoftDSV Kai> still buggy and in use?) I haven't heard of anyone using SoftSDV in 2+ years or so. Of course, that doesn't mean there aren't any users there... Perhaps a better question to ask: is there any reason to _ever_ include those sections in the kernel? --david