mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
To: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Skip SIS domain scan if fully busy
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 14:21:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1603a7f0-7587-ad29-b7a4-dfce290449fd@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909055304.25171-5-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>

On 2022/9/9 13:53, Abel Wu wrote:
> If a full domain scan failed, then no unoccupied cpus available
> and the LLC is fully busy.  In this case we'd better use cpus
> more wisely, rather than wasting it trying to find an idle cpu
> that probably not exist. The fully busy status will be cleared
> when any cpu of that LLC goes idle and everything goes back to
> normal again.
> 
> Make the has_idle_cores boolean hint more rich by turning it
> into a state machine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched/topology.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/sched/fair.c            | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> index 816df6cc444e..cc6089765b64 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> @@ -77,10 +77,43 @@ extern int sched_domain_level_max;
>  
>  struct sched_group;
>  
> +/*
> + * States of the sched-domain
> + *
> + * - sd_has_icores
> + *	This state is only used in LLC domains to indicate worthy
> + *	of a full scan in SIS due to idle cores available.
> + *
> + * - sd_has_icpus
> + *	This state indicates that unoccupied (sched-idle/idle) cpus
> + *	might exist in this domain. For the LLC domains it is the
> + *	default state since these cpus are the main targets of SIS
> + *	search, and is also used as a fallback state of the other
> + *	states.
> + *
> + * - sd_is_busy
> + *	This state indicates there are no unoccupied cpus in this
> + *	domain. So for LLC domains, it gives the hint on whether
> + *	we should put efforts on the SIS search or not.
> + *
> + * For LLC domains, sd_has_icores is set when the last non-idle cpu of
> + * a core becomes idle. After a full SIS scan and if no idle cores found,
> + * sd_has_icores must be cleared and the state will be set to sd_has_icpus
> + * or sd_is_busy depending on whether there is any idle cpu. And during
> + * load balancing on each SMT domain inside the LLC, the state will be
> + * re-evaluated and switch from sd_is_busy to sd_has_icpus if idle cpus
> + * exist.
> + */
> +enum sd_state {
> +	sd_has_icores,
> +	sd_has_icpus,
> +	sd_is_busy
> +};
> +
>  struct sched_domain_shared {
>  	atomic_t	ref;
>  	atomic_t	nr_busy_cpus;
> -	int		has_idle_cores;
> +	enum sd_state	state;
>  	int		nr_idle_scan;
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index fad289530e07..25df73c7e73c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6262,26 +6262,47 @@ static inline int __select_idle_cpu(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_smt_present);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_smt_present);
>  
> -static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
> +static inline void set_llc_state(int cpu, enum sd_state state)
>  {
>  	struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
>  
>  	sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
>  	if (sds)
> -		WRITE_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores, val);
> +		WRITE_ONCE(sds->state, state);
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
> +static inline enum sd_state get_llc_state(int cpu, enum sd_state def)
>  {
>  	struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
>  
>  	sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
>  	if (sds)
> -		return READ_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores);
> +		return READ_ONCE(sds->state);
>  
>  	return def;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void clear_idle_cpus(int cpu)
> +{
> +	set_llc_state(cpu, sd_is_busy);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool test_idle_cpus(int cpu)
> +{
> +	return get_llc_state(cpu, sd_has_icpus) != sd_is_busy;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int core_idle)
> +{
> +	set_llc_state(cpu, core_idle ? sd_has_icores : sd_has_icpus);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
> +{
> +	return sd_has_icores ==
> +	       get_llc_state(cpu, def ? sd_has_icores : sd_has_icpus);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Scans the local SMT mask to see if the entire core is idle, and records this
>   * information in sd_llc_shared->has_idle_cores.
> @@ -6291,25 +6312,29 @@ static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
>   */
>  void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -	int core = cpu_of(rq);
> -	int cpu;
> +	enum sd_state old, new = sd_has_icores;
> +	int core = cpu_of(rq), cpu;
>  
>  	if (rq->ttwu_pending)
>  		return;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	if (test_idle_cores(core, true))
> +	old = get_llc_state(core, sd_has_icores);
> +	if (old == sd_has_icores)
>  		goto unlock;
>  
>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
>  		if (cpu == core)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu))
> -			goto unlock;
> +		if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
> +			new = sd_has_icpus;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
> -	set_idle_cores(core, 1);
> +	if (old != new)
> +		set_llc_state(core, new);
>  unlock:
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  }

We'll reach this function only when SMT is active (sched_smt_present == True)...

> @@ -6370,6 +6395,15 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
>  
> +static inline void clear_idle_cpus(int cpu)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool test_idle_cpus(int cpu)
> +{
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
>  {
>  }
> @@ -6406,6 +6440,9 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
>  	struct sched_domain *this_sd;
>  	u64 time = 0;
>  
> +	if (!test_idle_cpus(target))
> +		return -1;
> +

...and on a non-SMT machine, we'll always fail here after the first time we clear_idle_cpus() below.
since we have no place to make sds->state to sd_has_icpus again. You may need to make sds->state
update in set_next_task_idle() also when smt is inactive.

>  	this_sd = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&sd_llc));
>  	if (!this_sd)
>  		return -1;
> @@ -6482,8 +6519,14 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (has_idle_core)
> -		set_idle_cores(target, false);
> +	/*
> +	 * If no idle cpu can be found, set LLC state to busy to prevent
> +	 * us from SIS domain scan to save a few cycles.
> +	 */
> +	if (idle_cpu == -1)
> +		clear_idle_cpus(target);
> +	else if (has_idle_core)
> +		set_idle_cores(target, 0);
>  
>  	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !has_idle_core) {
>  		time = cpu_clock(this) - time;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-14  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-09  5:52 [PATCH v5 0/5] sched/fair: Improve scan efficiency of SIS Abel Wu
2022-09-09  5:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] sched/fair: Ignore SIS_UTIL when has idle core Abel Wu
2022-09-14 21:58   ` Tim Chen
2022-09-09  5:53 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] sched/fair: Limited scan for idle cores when overloaded Abel Wu
2022-09-09  9:29   ` Chen Yu
2022-09-09 10:11     ` Abel Wu
2022-09-14 22:25   ` Tim Chen
2022-09-15  3:08     ` Abel Wu
2022-09-09  5:53 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] sched/fair: Skip core update if task pending Abel Wu
2022-09-09 10:09   ` Chen Yu
2022-09-09 10:13     ` Abel Wu
2022-09-14 22:37   ` Tim Chen
2022-09-09  5:53 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Skip SIS domain scan if fully busy Abel Wu
2022-09-14  6:21   ` Yicong Yang [this message]
2022-09-14  7:43     ` Abel Wu
2022-09-15  0:22   ` Tim Chen
2022-09-15  3:11     ` Abel Wu
2022-09-09  5:53 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] sched/fair: Introduce SIS_FILTER Abel Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1603a7f0-7587-ad29-b7a4-dfce290449fd@huawei.com \
    --to=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®