From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSO implementation
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:17:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16041.42469.529671.272810@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8c7m5$u3u$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
>>>>> On 25 Apr 2003 14:00:53 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> said:
hpa> Followup to: <16041.24730.267207.671647@napali.hpl.hp.com> By
hpa> author: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> In
hpa> newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>> I like this. Even better would be if all platforms could do the
>> same. I'm definitely interested in doing something similar for
>> ia64 (the getunwind() syscall was always just a stop-gap
>> solution).
>> I assume that these kernel ELF images would then show up in
>> dl_iterate_phdr()?
>> To complete the picture, it would be nice if the kernel ELF
>> images were mappable files (either in /sysfs or /proc) and would
>> show up in /proc/PID/maps. That way, a distributed application
>> such as a remote debugger could gain access to the kernel unwind
>> tables on a remote machine (assuming you have a remote
>> filesystem).
hpa> How about /boot?
You mean a regular file? I'm not sure whether this could be made to
work. The /proc/PID/maps entry (really: the vm_area for the kernel
ELF images) would have to be created by the kernel, at a time when no
real filesystem is available. Also, since the kernel needs to store
the data in kernel-memory anyhow, I don't think there is much point in
storing it on disk as well.
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-25 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-25 1:10 Roland McGrath
2003-04-25 1:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-25 2:10 ` Roland McGrath
2003-04-25 16:21 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-25 21:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-25 21:17 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-04-25 21:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-25 21:50 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-26 22:06 ` Roland McGrath
2003-04-26 17:15 ` Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16041.42469.529671.272810@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®