From: "tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org
Subject: [tip: irq/core] irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq offset incrementation
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 19:23:11 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160693699114.3364.3770140200988474994.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201202115732.27827-5-frederic@kernel.org>
The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: d3759e7184f8f6187e62f8c4e7dcb1f6c47c075a
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/d3759e7184f8f6187e62f8c4e7dcb1f6c47c075a
Author: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:57:31 +01:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 20:20:05 +01:00
irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq offset incrementation
IRQ time entry is currently accounted before HARDIRQ_OFFSET or
SOFTIRQ_OFFSET are incremented. This is convenient to decide to which
index the cputime to account is dispatched.
Unfortunately it prevents tick_irq_enter() from being called under
HARDIRQ_OFFSET because tick_irq_enter() has to be called before the IRQ
entry accounting due to the necessary clock catch up. As a result we
don't benefit from appropriate lockdep coverage on tick_irq_enter().
To prepare for fixing this, move the IRQ entry cputime accounting after
the preempt offset is incremented. This requires the cputime dispatch
code to handle the extra offset.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201202115732.27827-5-frederic@kernel.org
---
include/linux/hardirq.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/vtime.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
kernel/softirq.c | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/hardirq.h b/include/linux/hardirq.h
index 754f67a..7c9d6a2 100644
--- a/include/linux/hardirq.h
+++ b/include/linux/hardirq.h
@@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_irq_enter_check_tick(void)
*/
#define __irq_enter() \
do { \
- account_irq_enter_time(current); \
preempt_count_add(HARDIRQ_OFFSET); \
lockdep_hardirq_enter(); \
+ account_hardirq_enter(current); \
} while (0)
/*
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ void irq_enter_rcu(void);
*/
#define __irq_exit() \
do { \
+ account_hardirq_exit(current); \
lockdep_hardirq_exit(); \
- account_irq_exit_time(current); \
preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET); \
} while (0)
diff --git a/include/linux/vtime.h b/include/linux/vtime.h
index 6c98674..041d652 100644
--- a/include/linux/vtime.h
+++ b/include/linux/vtime.h
@@ -83,32 +83,46 @@ static inline void vtime_init_idle(struct task_struct *tsk, int cpu) { }
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
-extern void vtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk);
+extern void vtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int offset);
extern void vtime_account_softirq(struct task_struct *tsk);
extern void vtime_account_hardirq(struct task_struct *tsk);
extern void vtime_flush(struct task_struct *tsk);
#else /* !CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE */
-static inline void vtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
+static inline void vtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int offset) { }
+static inline void vtime_account_softirq(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
+static inline void vtime_account_hardirq(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
static inline void vtime_flush(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
-extern void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk);
+extern void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int offset);
#else
-static inline void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
+static inline void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int offset) { }
#endif
-static inline void account_irq_enter_time(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static inline void account_softirq_enter(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- vtime_account_irq(tsk);
- irqtime_account_irq(tsk);
+ vtime_account_irq(tsk, SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
+ irqtime_account_irq(tsk, SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
}
-static inline void account_irq_exit_time(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static inline void account_softirq_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- vtime_account_irq(tsk);
- irqtime_account_irq(tsk);
+ vtime_account_softirq(tsk);
+ irqtime_account_irq(tsk, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void account_hardirq_enter(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ vtime_account_irq(tsk, HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
+ irqtime_account_irq(tsk, HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
+}
+
+static inline void account_hardirq_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ vtime_account_hardirq(tsk);
+ irqtime_account_irq(tsk, 0);
}
#endif /* _LINUX_KERNEL_VTIME_H */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 02163d4..5f61165 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -44,12 +44,13 @@ static void irqtime_account_delta(struct irqtime *irqtime, u64 delta,
}
/*
- * Called before incrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_enter
+ * Called after incrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_enter
* and before decrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_exit.
*/
-void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *curr)
+void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int offset)
{
struct irqtime *irqtime = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_irqtime);
+ unsigned int pc;
s64 delta;
int cpu;
@@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *curr)
cpu = smp_processor_id();
delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - irqtime->irq_start_time;
irqtime->irq_start_time += delta;
+ pc = preempt_count() - offset;
/*
* We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
@@ -66,9 +68,9 @@ void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *curr)
* in that case, so as not to confuse scheduler with a special task
* that do not consume any time, but still wants to run.
*/
- if (hardirq_count())
+ if (pc & HARDIRQ_MASK)
irqtime_account_delta(irqtime, delta, CPUTIME_IRQ);
- else if (in_serving_softirq() && curr != this_cpu_ksoftirqd())
+ else if ((pc & SOFTIRQ_OFFSET) && curr != this_cpu_ksoftirqd())
irqtime_account_delta(irqtime, delta, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ);
}
@@ -417,11 +419,13 @@ void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
}
# endif
-void vtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk)
+void vtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int offset)
{
- if (hardirq_count()) {
+ unsigned int pc = preempt_count() - offset;
+
+ if (pc & HARDIRQ_OFFSET) {
vtime_account_hardirq(tsk);
- } else if (in_serving_softirq()) {
+ } else if (pc & SOFTIRQ_OFFSET) {
vtime_account_softirq(tsk);
} else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_IDLE) &&
is_idle_task(tsk)) {
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 617009c..b8f42b3 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -315,10 +315,10 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
pending = local_softirq_pending();
- account_irq_enter_time(current);
__local_bh_disable_ip(_RET_IP_, SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
in_hardirq = lockdep_softirq_start();
+ account_softirq_enter(current);
restart:
/* Reset the pending bitmask before enabling irqs */
@@ -365,8 +365,8 @@ restart:
wakeup_softirqd();
}
+ account_softirq_exit(current);
lockdep_softirq_end(in_hardirq);
- account_irq_exit_time(current);
__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
current_restore_flags(old_flags, PF_MEMALLOC);
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static inline void __irq_exit_rcu(void)
#else
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
#endif
- account_irq_exit_time(current);
+ account_hardirq_exit(current);
preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
if (!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending())
invoke_softirq();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-02 11:57 [PATCH 0/5] irq: Reorder time handling against HARDIRQ_OFFSET on IRQ entry v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/cputime: Remove symbol exports from IRQ time accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 19:23 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 19:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Christian Borntraeger
2020-12-02 11:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] s390/vtime: Use the generic IRQ entry accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 19:23 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 19:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] " Christian Borntraeger
2020-12-02 11:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/vtime: Consolidate IRQ time accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 19:23 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 11:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq offset incrementation Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 19:23 ` tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2020-12-28 2:15 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-29 13:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-29 14:12 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-29 14:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-29 15:58 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-02 11:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] irq: Call tick_irq_enter() inside HARDIRQ_OFFSET Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 19:23 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160693699114.3364.3770140200988474994.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®