mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	"Anshuman Khandual" <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC 1/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 12:42:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1608621144-4001-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1608621144-4001-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

pfn_valid() validates a pfn but basically it checks for a valid struct page
backing for that pfn. It should always return positive for memory ranges
backed with struct page mapping. But currently pfn_valid() fails for all
ZONE_DEVICE based memory types even though they have struct page mapping.

pfn_valid() asserts that there is a memblock entry for a given pfn without
MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag being set. The problem with ZONE_DEVICE based memory is
that they do not have memblock entries. Hence memblock_is_map_memory() will
invariably fail via memblock_search() for a ZONE_DEVICE based address. This
eventually fails pfn_valid() which is wrong. memblock_is_map_memory() needs
to be skipped for such memory ranges. As ZONE_DEVICE memory gets hotplugged
into the system via memremap_pages() called from a driver, their respective
memory sections will not have SECTION_IS_EARLY set.

Normal hotplug memory will never have MEMBLOCK_NOMAP set in their memblock
regions. Because the flag MEMBLOCK_NOMAP was specifically designed and set
for firmware reserved memory regions. memblock_is_map_memory() can just be
skipped as its always going to be positive and that will be an optimization
for the normal hotplug memory. Like ZONE_DEVIE based memory, all hotplugged
normal memory too will not have SECTION_IS_EARLY set for their sections.

Skipping memblock_is_map_memory() for all non early memory sections would
fix pfn_valid() problem for ZONE_DEVICE based memory and also improve its
performance for normal hotplug memory as well.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 73b20c84d42d ("arm64: mm: implement pte_devmap support")
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 75addb36354a..ee23bda00c28 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -225,6 +225,18 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
 
 	if (!valid_section(__pfn_to_section(pfn)))
 		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * ZONE_DEVICE memory does not have the memblock entries.
+	 * memblock_is_map_memory() check for ZONE_DEVICE based
+	 * addresses will always fail. Even the normal hotplugged
+	 * memory will never have MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag set in their
+	 * memblock entries. Skip memblock search for all non early
+	 * memory sections covering all of hotplug memory including
+	 * both normal and ZONE_DEVIE based.
+	 */
+	if (!early_section(__pfn_to_section(pfn)))
+		return 1;
 #endif
 	return memblock_is_map_memory(addr);
 }
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-22  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-22  7:12 [RFC 0/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVIE " Anshuman Khandual
2020-12-22  7:12 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2020-12-22  9:11   ` [RFC 1/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE " David Hildenbrand
2021-01-04  6:18     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-11 10:31       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-11 14:00         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-04 15:36   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-05  3:25     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25  6:22   ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25  7:31     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-01-27  3:46       ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25  9:13     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-27  4:06       ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-27  9:29         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-28  7:42           ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-12-22  7:12 ` [RFC 2/2] arm64/mm: Reorganize pfn_valid() Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1608621144-4001-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®