mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	tariqt@nvidia.com, ttoukan.linux@gmail.com, aams@amazon.de,
	kuni1840@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tariqt@mellanox.com,
	borisp@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next] net: Remove redundant calls of sk_tx_queue_clear().
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 05:10:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161198340716.22188.10513485012044993469.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210128150217.6060-1-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:02:17 +0900 you wrote:
> The commit 41b14fb8724d ("net: Do not clear the sock TX queue in
> sk_set_socket()") removes sk_tx_queue_clear() from sk_set_socket() and adds
> it instead in sk_alloc() and sk_clone_lock() to fix an issue introduced in
> the commit e022f0b4a03f ("net: Introduce sk_tx_queue_mapping"). On the
> other hand, the original commit had already put sk_tx_queue_clear() in
> sk_prot_alloc(): the callee of sk_alloc() and sk_clone_lock(). Thus
> sk_tx_queue_clear() is called twice in each path.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v5,net-next] net: Remove redundant calls of sk_tx_queue_clear().
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/df610cd9163b

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-30  5:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28 15:02 Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-01-30  5:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161198340716.22188.10513485012044993469.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=aams@amazon.de \
    --cc=borisp@mellanox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®