From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+174de899852504e4a74a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+3d1c772efafd3c38d007@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
hdanton@sina.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Fix clearance of Tx/Rx ring when releasing a call
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 02:20:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161249160678.1910.11108214897689431024.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161234207610.653119.5287360098400436976.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):
On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 08:47:56 +0000 you wrote:
> At the end of rxrpc_release_call(), rxrpc_cleanup_ring() is called to clear
> the Rx/Tx skbuff ring, but this doesn't lock the ring whilst it's accessing
> it. Unfortunately, rxrpc_resend() might be trying to retransmit a packet
> concurrently with this - and whilst it does lock the ring, this isn't
> protection against rxrpc_cleanup_call().
>
> Fix this by removing the call to rxrpc_cleanup_ring() from
> rxrpc_release_call(). rxrpc_cleanup_ring() will be called again anyway
> from rxrpc_cleanup_call(). The earlier call is just an optimisation to
> recycle skbuffs more quickly.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] rxrpc: Fix clearance of Tx/Rx ring when releasing a call
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/7b5eab57cac4
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-03 8:47 David Howells
2021-02-05 2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161249160678.1910.11108214897689431024.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+174de899852504e4a74a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+3d1c772efafd3c38d007@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®