From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751414AbdBXOv3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:51:29 -0500 Received: from resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.36]:51654 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218AbdBXOvY (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:51:24 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 428 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:51:24 EST Reply-To: shuah@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests, x86, pkeys: test with random, unallocated protection keys References: <20170223222603.A022ED65@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20170223222604.D3AE8473@viggo.jf.intel.com> <806cc744-98a2-7575-30bc-a703b75a9640@kernel.org> <20170224074511.GB4095@gmail.com> To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Shuah Khan From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: <16132b4a-0a04-a4d9-f081-3ef7d51e4d78@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 07:41:48 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170224074511.GB4095@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPZDAxPXmK5IBZWQQIxvkHdQmFBsaDTo+fQcHAJIxQ0H+QLutP/akKO+a9B6+qYWJY5tjMy3d7+J7TXLAQzt0tM3MNww77hq98IN+wGUeK6K2mgtqRN4 uB+OeBUE42qQOf8P8qXZ+StJf8g/zkloDeD2bIaTFLtZ+KZgizpsNb3dwoHwvXWst3WIaqISqB8f173ITTwPEb2U/DvLWhjMEKac04yLWJyHmfdGOrslmUfV Dq4rO+Ilg5ML7mkFj8vo8pwC8dDE8RBcsmrk0MVCOadnRf7ZgEDemVko6DKmff9Sr7YvRjUm9ufMYSsF/zAs8VxZtQ79YbikFCqRJGa1bDIxmsEolvu8lrcJ hHLUYMictV2Y07FmmON2HER9Pg/1DjIEB6nIFgIViV6bka3XKCUJAZv7Phq9qUOo2tPdBbn+ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/24/2017 12:45 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Shuah Khan wrote: > >> On 02/23/2017 03:26 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: >>> Shuah, I assume you'll take this patch in through the selftests tree. >> >> Yes I can do that. > > No, let's not do that please, we have a fix and a self-tests update, I'd like them > to be next in the Git space. > > I'll apply the testcase too when applying the pkeys fix, ok? > > Thanks, > > Ingo > > Yup. I noticed the first patch has to go through x86 tree, Sounds good to me. Please take both through. I am sending pull request for 4.11-rc1 today. I have a few pkeys patches in there. Hope there won't be any conflicts. thanks, -- Shuah