From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3] x86/kvm: Fix broken irq restoration in kvm_wait
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:55:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1615791328-2735-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> (raw)
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
After commit 997acaf6b4b59c (lockdep: report broken irq restoration), the guest
splatting below during boot:
raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 169 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10 warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x26/0x30
Modules linked in: hid_generic usbhid hid
CPU: 1 PID: 169 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.11.0+ #25
RIP: 0010:warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x26/0x30
Call Trace:
kvm_wait+0x76/0x90
__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x285/0x2e0
do_raw_spin_lock+0xc9/0xd0
_raw_spin_lock+0x59/0x70
lockref_get_not_dead+0xf/0x50
__legitimize_path+0x31/0x60
legitimize_root+0x37/0x50
try_to_unlazy_next+0x7f/0x1d0
lookup_fast+0xb0/0x170
path_openat+0x165/0x9b0
do_filp_open+0x99/0x110
do_sys_openat2+0x1f1/0x2e0
do_sys_open+0x5c/0x80
__x64_sys_open+0x21/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x32/0x50
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
The irqflags handling in kvm_wait() which ends up doing:
local_irq_save(flags);
safe_halt();
local_irq_restore(flags);
which triggered a new consistency checking, we generally expect
local_irq_save() and local_irq_restore() to be pared and sanely
nested, and so local_irq_restore() expects to be called with
irqs disabled.
This patch fixes it by playing local_irq_disable()/enable() directly.
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
---
v2 -> v3:
* per Sean's suggestion
arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
index 5e78e01..72dbb74 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -836,28 +836,25 @@ static void kvm_kick_cpu(int cpu)
static void kvm_wait(u8 *ptr, u8 val)
{
- unsigned long flags;
-
if (in_nmi())
return;
- local_irq_save(flags);
-
- if (READ_ONCE(*ptr) != val)
- goto out;
-
/*
* halt until it's our turn and kicked. Note that we do safe halt
* for irq enabled case to avoid hang when lock info is overwritten
* in irq spinlock slowpath and no spurious interrupt occur to save us.
*/
- if (arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
- halt();
- else
- safe_halt();
+ if (irqs_disabled()) {
+ if (READ_ONCE(*ptr) == val)
+ halt();
+ } else {
+ local_irq_disable();
-out:
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ if (READ_ONCE(*ptr) == val)
+ safe_halt();
+
+ local_irq_enable();
+ }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-15 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-15 6:55 Wanpeng Li [this message]
2021-03-18 17:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1615791328-2735-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com \
--to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®