From: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: dan@debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext3-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: ext3 badness in 2.6.0-test2
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:00:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16178.63046.43567.551323@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Andrew Morton on Tuesday August 5
On Tuesday August 5, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
> > ...
> > Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md1): ext3_add_entry: bad entry in directory #41
> > 009295: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=3265411686, rec_len=0, name_len=0
>
> It looks like we had a block full of zeroes come back from the device
> driver. I find it distinctly fishy how this happens so much with
> ext3-on-md, and so little with ext3-on-just-a-disk.
Well, they're not *all* zero.....
I can reproduce this easily with various configurations of ext3 over
raid5, and get a similar problem with ext2 over raid5 (corrupt inodes
rather than directory entries) but ext3 over raid0 is rock-solid.
So I guess the finger points generally in the direction of raid5.
Now I've just got to figure if it is a bug in r5, or some assumption
that it makes that is no longer valid (I was briefly suspicious of
PF_READAHEAD which could have made a real mess of raid5, but that
wouldn't have this symptom)
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-08 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-04 14:22 Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-04 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-06 6:36 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-06 6:57 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-06 20:18 ` md+ext3 " Frank van de Pol
2003-08-08 1:00 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2003-08-08 1:16 ` ext3 " Andrew Morton
2003-08-09 0:39 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-09 1:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-10 23:44 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-06 6:40 rwhron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16178.63046.43567.551323@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=ext3-users@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®