From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/kvm: Don't bother __pv_cpu_mask when !CONFIG_SMP
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:18:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1617941911-5338-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> (raw)
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Enable PV TLB shootdown when !CONFIG_SMP doesn't make sense. Let's
move it inside CONFIG_SMP. In addition, we can avoid define and
alloc __pv_cpu_mask when !CONFIG_SMP and get rid of 'alloc' variable
in kvm_alloc_cpumask.
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
* shuffle things around a bit more
arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
index 5e78e01..224a7a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -451,6 +451,10 @@ static void __init sev_map_percpu_data(void)
}
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, __pv_cpu_mask);
+
static bool pv_tlb_flush_supported(void)
{
return (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_TLB_FLUSH) &&
@@ -458,10 +462,6 @@ static bool pv_tlb_flush_supported(void)
kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME));
}
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, __pv_cpu_mask);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-
static bool pv_ipi_supported(void)
{
return kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_SEND_IPI);
@@ -574,6 +574,49 @@ static void kvm_smp_send_call_func_ipi(const struct cpumask *mask)
}
}
+static void kvm_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
+ const struct flush_tlb_info *info)
+{
+ u8 state;
+ int cpu;
+ struct kvm_steal_time *src;
+ struct cpumask *flushmask = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(__pv_cpu_mask);
+
+ cpumask_copy(flushmask, cpumask);
+ /*
+ * We have to call flush only on online vCPUs. And
+ * queue flush_on_enter for pre-empted vCPUs
+ */
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, flushmask) {
+ src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);
+ state = READ_ONCE(src->preempted);
+ if ((state & KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED)) {
+ if (try_cmpxchg(&src->preempted, &state,
+ state | KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB))
+ __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, flushmask);
+ }
+ }
+
+ native_flush_tlb_others(flushmask, info);
+}
+
+static __init int kvm_alloc_cpumask(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (!kvm_para_available() || nopv)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (pv_tlb_flush_supported() || pv_ipi_supported())
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ zalloc_cpumask_var_node(per_cpu_ptr(&__pv_cpu_mask, cpu),
+ GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(kvm_alloc_cpumask);
+
static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
{
/*
@@ -611,33 +654,8 @@ static int kvm_cpu_down_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
local_irq_enable();
return 0;
}
-#endif
-
-static void kvm_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
- const struct flush_tlb_info *info)
-{
- u8 state;
- int cpu;
- struct kvm_steal_time *src;
- struct cpumask *flushmask = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(__pv_cpu_mask);
-
- cpumask_copy(flushmask, cpumask);
- /*
- * We have to call flush only on online vCPUs. And
- * queue flush_on_enter for pre-empted vCPUs
- */
- for_each_cpu(cpu, flushmask) {
- src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);
- state = READ_ONCE(src->preempted);
- if ((state & KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED)) {
- if (try_cmpxchg(&src->preempted, &state,
- state | KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB))
- __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, flushmask);
- }
- }
- native_flush_tlb_others(flushmask, info);
-}
+#endif
static void __init kvm_guest_init(void)
{
@@ -653,12 +671,6 @@ static void __init kvm_guest_init(void)
pv_ops.time.steal_clock = kvm_steal_clock;
}
- if (pv_tlb_flush_supported()) {
- pv_ops.mmu.flush_tlb_others = kvm_flush_tlb_others;
- pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table = tlb_remove_table;
- pr_info("KVM setup pv remote TLB flush\n");
- }
-
if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI))
apic_set_eoi_write(kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write);
@@ -668,6 +680,12 @@ static void __init kvm_guest_init(void)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ if (pv_tlb_flush_supported()) {
+ pv_ops.mmu.flush_tlb_others = kvm_flush_tlb_others;
+ pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table = tlb_remove_table;
+ pr_info("KVM setup pv remote TLB flush\n");
+ }
+
smp_ops.smp_prepare_boot_cpu = kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu;
if (pv_sched_yield_supported()) {
smp_ops.send_call_func_ipi = kvm_smp_send_call_func_ipi;
@@ -734,7 +752,7 @@ static uint32_t __init kvm_detect(void)
static void __init kvm_apic_init(void)
{
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (pv_ipi_supported())
kvm_setup_pv_ipi();
#endif
@@ -794,32 +812,6 @@ static __init int activate_jump_labels(void)
}
arch_initcall(activate_jump_labels);
-static __init int kvm_alloc_cpumask(void)
-{
- int cpu;
- bool alloc = false;
-
- if (!kvm_para_available() || nopv)
- return 0;
-
- if (pv_tlb_flush_supported())
- alloc = true;
-
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
- if (pv_ipi_supported())
- alloc = true;
-#endif
-
- if (alloc)
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- zalloc_cpumask_var_node(per_cpu_ptr(&__pv_cpu_mask, cpu),
- GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-arch_initcall(kvm_alloc_cpumask);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
/* Kick a cpu by its apicid. Used to wake up a halted vcpu */
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-09 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-09 4:18 Wanpeng Li [this message]
2021-04-09 4:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: X86: Count attempted/successful directed yield Wanpeng Li
2021-04-09 4:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: X86: Do not yield to self Wanpeng Li
2021-04-17 12:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/kvm: Don't bother __pv_cpu_mask when !CONFIG_SMP Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1617941911-5338-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com \
--to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®