From: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Tupshin Harper <tupshin@tupshin.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: data corruption using raid0+lvm2+jfs with 2.6.0-test3
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:05:58 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16185.29398.80225.875488@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Andrew Morton on Tuesday August 12
On Tuesday August 12, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> Tupshin Harper <tupshin@tupshin.com> wrote:
> >
> > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than
> > 8k 12436792 8
>
> There is a fix for this at
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test3/2.6.0-test3-mm1/broken-out/bio-too-big-fix.patch
>
> Results of testing are always appreciated...
I don't think this will help. It is a different problem.
As far as I can tell, the problem is that dm doesn't honour the
merge_bvec_fn of the underlying device (neither does md for that
matter).
I think it does honour the max_sectors restriction, so it will only
allow a request as big as one chunk, but it will allow such a requests
to span a chunk boundary.
Probably the simplest solution to this is to put in calls to
bio_split, which will need to be strengthed to handle multi-page bios.
The policy would be:
"a client of a block device *should* honour the various bio size
restrictions, and may suffer performance loss if it doesn't;
a block device driver *must* handle any bio it is passed, and may
call bio_split to help out".
A better solution, which is too much for 2.6.0, is to have a cleaner
interface wherein the client of the block device uses a two-stage
process to submit requests.
Firstly it says:
I want to do IO at this location, what is the max number of sectors
allowed?
Then it adds pages to the bio upto that limit.
Finally it say
OK, here is the request.
The first and final stages have to be properly paired so that a
device knows if there are any pending requests and can hold-off any
device reconfiguration until all pending requests have completed.
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-12 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-12 20:45 Tupshin Harper
2003-08-12 21:08 ` Christophe Saout
2003-08-12 21:10 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-08-12 21:28 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-12 23:05 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2003-08-13 7:25 ` Joe Thornber
2003-08-15 21:27 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-16 8:00 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-16 14:18 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-08-16 23:52 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-17 0:12 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-17 17:50 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-17 23:14 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-18 0:28 ` Mike Fedyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16185.29398.80225.875488@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tupshin@tupshin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®