From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, frederic@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, huangxiaojia2@huawei.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, samuel.holland@sifive.com,
palmer@rivosinc.com, charlie@rivosinc.com,
thiago.bauermann@linaro.org, bgray@linux.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, puranjay@kernel.org,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, mbenes@suse.cz,
joel.granados@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] support FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY feature
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 19:38:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1618bf36-7f7a-4d32-a6a6-242323007d67@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250403174701.74312-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
On 03.04.25 19:46, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> The FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY feature provides support for
> tag check for store operation only. read operation is considered
> as unchecked operation so it doesn't raise tag check fault.
Can you add/share more details of what the implications are, how it
would be used, who would set it, etc.
Just from staring at this short paragraph leaves me rather clueless.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 17:46 Yeoreum Yun
2025-04-03 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64/feature: add MTE_STORE_ONLY feature Yeoreum Yun
2025-04-03 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] prtcl: introduce PR_MTE_STORE_ONLY Yeoreum Yun
2025-04-03 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64/kernel: support store-only mte tag check Yeoreum Yun
2025-04-03 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/kselftest: add MTE_STORE_ONLY feature hwcap test Yeoreum Yun
2025-04-04 15:58 ` Mark Brown
2025-04-04 17:38 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-04-04 19:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] support FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY feature Yeoreum Yun
2025-04-04 20:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-04 21:08 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1618bf36-7f7a-4d32-a6a6-242323007d67@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=bgray@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io \
--cc=huangxiaojia2@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®