From: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
To: <amhetre@nvidia.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
Cc: <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix race condition during iommu_group creation
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:46:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1623298614-31755-3-git-send-email-amhetre@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1623298614-31755-1-git-send-email-amhetre@nvidia.com>
From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
iommu_group is getting created more than once during asynchronous multiple
display heads(devices) probe on Tegra194 SoC. All the display heads share
same SID and are expected to be in same iommu_group.
As arm_smmu_device_group() is not protecting group creation across devices,
it is leading to multiple groups creation across devices with same SID and
subsequent IOMMU faults.
Fix this by protecting group creation with smmu->stream_map_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
index 6f72c4d..21af179 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -1458,6 +1458,7 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
int i, idx;
+ mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
@@ -1466,8 +1467,10 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
group = smmu->s2crs[idx].group;
}
- if (group)
+ if (group) {
+ mutex_unlock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
return iommu_group_ref_get(group);
+ }
if (dev_is_pci(dev))
group = pci_device_group(dev);
@@ -1481,6 +1484,7 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx)
smmu->s2crs[idx].group = group;
+ mutex_unlock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
return group;
}
--
2.7.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-10 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-10 4:16 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix races in iommu domain/group creation Ashish Mhetre
2021-06-10 4:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Fix race condition during default domain allocation Ashish Mhetre
2021-06-11 10:45 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-11 12:49 ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-17 5:51 ` Ashish Mhetre
2021-06-17 17:49 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-11 18:30 ` Krishna Reddy
2021-06-10 4:16 ` Ashish Mhetre [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1623298614-31755-3-git-send-email-amhetre@nvidia.com \
--to=amhetre@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®