From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262954AbTI2KsP (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:48:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262955AbTI2KsP (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:48:15 -0400 Received: from meryl.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.42]:19418 "EHLO meryl.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262954AbTI2KsO (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:48:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16248.3563.675576.448898@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:48:11 +0200 From: Mikael Pettersson To: "Norman Diamond" Cc: Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test5, gcc 3.3, aic7(censored)_core.c In-Reply-To: <2ff401c38611$5ef13d20$44ee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> References: <2ff401c38611$5ef13d20$44ee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Norman Diamond writes: > In 2.6.0-test5, the README still says "Make sure you have gcc 2.95.3 > available." It is telling the truth. > > SuSE 8.2 includes gcc 3.3 20030226 (prerelease). Up to the point of > aborting, it diagnoses a ton of "warning: comparison between signed and > unsigned", but nonetheless compiles many source files and continues. But in > aic7(censored)_core.c, line 76, it diagnoses "warning: `num_chip_names' > defined but not used". Even though this is also just a warning, obviously > it threatens disastrous consequences :-s (sarcasm). make[3] quits with > Error 1 and make[2] and make[1] quit with Error 2. Look for and delete any -Werror in aic7xxx' Makefile. I've seen people being bit by this before.