From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262301AbTJIQuh (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:50:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262303AbTJIQuh (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:50:37 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:63451 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262301AbTJIQug (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:50:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16261.37335.822076.188805@charged.uio.no> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:50:31 -0400 To: Paul Mundt Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sunrpc/clnt.c compile fix In-Reply-To: <20031009164048.GA12029@linux-sh.org> References: <20031009161350.GA9170@linux-sh.org> <20031009164048.GA12029@linux-sh.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmaster@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning. X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Paul Mundt writes: > Is there any reason why tk_pid needs to be under RPC_DEBUG in > the first place? If these are legitimate warning messages, > presumably it would be nice to know the offending pid as well. It's not a true process pid, but more of a tag on each struct rpc_task. It turns out to be more helpful when you are tracing the (d|)printk() debugging info, since a process may have several rpc_task in flight at any point in time. Cheers, Trond