From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Execute _EJ0 under the ACPI scan lock
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:22:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1629492.WLGZp2sePX@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since acpi_device_hotplug() assumes that ACPI handles of device
objects passed to it will not become invalid while acpi_scan_lock
is being held, make acpiphp_disable_slot() acquire acpi_scan_lock,
because it generally causes _EJ0 to be executed for one of the
devices in the slot and that may cause its ACPI handle to become
invalid.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
Hi All,
This change is not necessary in 3.14-rc (it wouldn't hurt, though), but it
closes a (mostly theoretical) race on top of the changes I've queued up for
3.15 in linux-next.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
@@ -1007,9 +1007,15 @@ int acpiphp_disable_slot(struct acpiphp_
{
int ret;
+ /*
+ * Acquire acpi_scan_lock to ensure that the execution of _EJ0 in
+ * acpiphp_disable_and_eject_slot() will be synchronized properly.
+ */
+ acpi_scan_lock_acquire();
pci_lock_rescan_remove();
ret = acpiphp_disable_and_eject_slot(slot);
pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
+ acpi_scan_lock_release();
return ret;
}
reply other threads:[~2014-02-08 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1629492.WLGZp2sePX@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®