mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>,
	Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
	ML nouveau <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: linux-6.2-rc4+ hangs on poweroff/reboot: Bisected
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:51:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1632a9ef-2954-c8f0-cdc9-03157c9d8547@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACAvsv5iYdF3P8AbyrbYo3zGmYRYhxDWn7WbAR5V9qHpbgBXRA@mail.gmail.com>



On 30/01/2023 23:27, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 09:09, Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi again.
>>
>> On 30/01/2023 20:19, Chris Clayton wrote:
>>> Thanks, Ben.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> This is a complete shot-in-the-dark, as I don't see this behaviour on
>>>> *any* of my boards.  Could you try the attached patch please?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the patch made no difference.
>>>
>>> I've been looking at how the graphics on my laptop is set up, and have a bit of a worry about whether the firmware might
>>> be playing a part in this problem. In order to offload video decoding to the NVidia TU117 GPU, it seems the scrubber
>>> firmware must be available, but as far as I know,that has not been released by NVidia. To get it to work, I followed
>>> what ubuntu have done and the scrubber in /lib/firmware/nvidia/tu117/nvdec/ is a symlink to
>>> ../../tu116/nvdev/scrubber.bin. That, of course, means that some of the firmware loaded is for a different card is being
>>> loaded. I note that processing related to firmware is being changed in the patch. Might my set up be at the root of my
>>> problem?
>>>
>>> I'll have a fiddle an see what I can work out.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ben.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> Well, my fiddling has got my system rebooting and shutting down successfully again. I found that if I delete the symlink
>> to the scrubber firmware, reboot and shutdown work again. There are however, a number of other files in the tu117
>> firmware directory tree that that are symlinks to actual files in its tu116 counterpart. So I deleted all of those too.
>> Unfortunately, the absence of one or more of those symlinks causes Xorg to fail to start. I've reinstated all the links
>> except scrubber and I now have a system that works as it did until I tried to run a kernel that includes the bad commit
>> I identified in my bisection. That includes offloading video decoding to the NVidia card, so what ever I read that said
>> the scrubber firmware was needed seems to have been wrong. I get a new message that (nouveau 0000:01:00.0: fb: VPR
>> locked, but no scrubber binary!), but, hey, we can't have everything.
>>
>> If you still want to get to the bottom of this, let me know what you need me to provide and I'll do my best. I suspect
>> you might want to because there will a n awful lot of Ubuntu-based systems out there with that scrubber.bin symlink in
>> place. On the other hand,m it could but quite a while before ubuntu are deploying 6.2 or later kernels.
> The symlinks are correct - whole groups of GPUs share the same FW, and
> we use symlinks in linux-firmware to represent this.
> 
> I don't really have any ideas how/why this patch causes issues with
> shutdown - it's a path that only gets executed during initialisation.
> Can you try and capture the kernel log during shutdown ("dmesg -w"
> over ssh? netconsole?), and see if there's any relevant messages
> providing a hint at what's going on?  Alternatively, you could try
> unloading the module (you will have to stop X/wayland/gdm/etc/etc
> first) and seeing if that hangs too.
> 
> Ben.

Sorry for the delay - I've been learning about netconsole and netcat. However, I had no success with ssh and netconsole
produced a log with nothing unusual in it.

Simply stopping Xorg and removing the nouveau module succeeds.

So, I rebuilt rc6+ after a pull from linus' tree this morning and set the nouveau debug level to 7. I then booted to a
console before doing a reboot (with Ctl+Alt+Del). As expected the machine locked up just before it would ordinarily
restart. The last few lines on the console might be helpful:

...
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  fifo: preinit running...
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  fifo: preinit completed in 4us
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  gr: preinit running...
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  gr: preinit completed in 0us
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  nvdec0: preinit running...
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  nvdec0: preinit completed in 0us
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  nvdec0: preinit running...
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  nvdec0: preinit completed in 0us
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  sec2: preinit running...
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  sec2: preinit completed in 0us
nouveau 0000:01:00:0  fb:.VPR locked, running scrubber binary

These messages appear after the "sd 4:0:0:0 [sda] Stopping disk" I reported in my initial email.

After the "running scrubber" line appears the machine is locked and I have to hold down the power button to recover. I
get the same outcome from running "halt -dip", "poweroff -di" and "shutdown -h -P now". I guess it's no surprise that
all three result in the same outcome because invocations halt, poweroff and reboot (without the -f argument)from a
runlevel other than 0 resukt in shutdown being run. switching to runlevel 0 with "telenit 0" results in the same
messages from nouveau followed by the lockup.

Let me know if you need any additional diagnostics.

Chris

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> <snip>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-01 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-18 20:59 Chris Clayton
2023-01-19 14:33 ` Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-01-19 16:43   ` Linux kernel regression tracking (#update)
2023-01-27 11:20   ` Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-01-27 11:35     ` Karol Herbst
2023-01-27 19:41       ` Chris Clayton
2023-01-27 19:46     ` Chris Clayton
2023-01-28  5:42       ` Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-01-28 11:29         ` Chris Clayton
2023-01-30  1:09           ` Ben Skeggs
2023-01-30 20:19             ` Chris Clayton
2023-01-30 23:09               ` Chris Clayton
2023-01-30 23:27                 ` Ben Skeggs
2023-02-01 13:51                   ` Chris Clayton [this message]
2023-02-02 20:45                     ` Chris Clayton
2023-02-08  8:48                       ` Chris Clayton
2023-02-10 18:35                         ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-02-10 19:01                           ` Karol Herbst
2023-02-10 19:33                             ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-02-11 13:38                               ` Chris Clayton
2023-02-13  2:57                                 ` Dave Airlie
2023-02-13  9:14                                   ` Chris Clayton
2023-02-15 10:36                                     ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-02-15 11:09                                       ` Karol Herbst
2023-02-18 12:22                                         ` Chris Clayton
2023-02-18 12:25                                           ` Karol Herbst
2023-02-18 15:19                                             ` Chris Clayton
2023-02-18 18:55                                               ` Chris Clayton
2023-02-20  5:35                                                 ` Ben Skeggs
2023-02-20 10:51                                                   ` Chris Clayton
2023-02-20 11:26                                                     ` Karol Herbst
2023-02-20 22:16                                                       ` Ben Skeggs
2023-03-10  9:26                                                         ` Chris Clayton
2023-03-10 10:20                                                           ` Karol Herbst
2023-03-12 13:30                                                             ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1632a9ef-2954-c8f0-cdc9-03157c9d8547@googlemail.com \
    --to=chris2553@googlemail.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=skeggsb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®