mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Removal of printk safe buffers delays NMI context printk
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 10:26:11 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1636158295.cxlln6r0kk.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lf22eem7.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>

Excerpts from John Ogness's message of November 6, 2021 2:44 am:
> On 2021-11-05, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
>> On Fri 2021-11-05 15:03:27, John Ogness wrote:
>>> On 2021-11-05, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> but we do need that printk flush capability back there and for
>>>> nmi_backtrace.
>>> 
>>> Agreed. I had not considered this necessary side-effect when I
>>> removed the NMI safe buffers.
>>
>> Honestly, I do not understand why it stopped working or how
>> it worked before.
> 
> IIUC, Nick is presenting a problem where a lockup on the other CPUs is
> detected. Those CPUs will dump their backtraces per NMI context. But in
> their lockup state the irq_work for those CPUs is not functional. So
> even though the messages are in the buffer, there is no one printing the
> buffer.

Yep.

> printk_safe_flush() would dump the NMI safe buffers for all the CPUs
> into the printk buffer, then trigger an irq_work on itself (the
> non-locked-up CPU).
> 
> That irq_work trigger was critical, because the other CPUs (which also
> triggered irq_works for themselves) aren't able to process irq_works. I
> did not consider this case. Which is why we still need to trigger
> irq_work here. (Or, as the removed comment hinted at, add some printk()
> call to either directly print or trigger the irq_work.)

This patch seems to work, I can submit it if you'd like?

Thanks,
Nick

---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c | 6 ++++++
 include/linux/printk.h         | 4 ++++
 kernel/printk/printk.c         | 5 +++++
 lib/nmi_backtrace.c            | 6 ++++++
 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c
index 5f69ba4de1f3..c8017bc23b00 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -227,6 +227,12 @@ static void watchdog_smp_panic(int cpu)
 		cpumask_clear(&wd_smp_cpus_ipi);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Force flush any remote buffers that might be stuck in IRQ context
+	 * and therefore could not run their irq_work.
+	 */
+	printk_trigger_flush();
+
 	if (hardlockup_panic)
 		nmi_panic(NULL, "Hard LOCKUP");
 
diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
index 85b656f82d75..9497f6b98339 100644
--- a/include/linux/printk.h
+++ b/include/linux/printk.h
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ void dump_stack_print_info(const char *log_lvl);
 void show_regs_print_info(const char *log_lvl);
 extern asmlinkage void dump_stack_lvl(const char *log_lvl) __cold;
 extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold;
+void printk_trigger_flush(void);
 #else
 static inline __printf(1, 0)
 int vprintk(const char *s, va_list args)
@@ -274,6 +275,9 @@ static inline void dump_stack_lvl(const char *log_lvl)
 static inline void dump_stack(void)
 {
 }
+static inline void printk_trigger_flush(void)
+{
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index a8d0a58deebc..99221b016c68 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -3252,6 +3252,11 @@ void defer_console_output(void)
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
+void printk_trigger_flush(void)
+{
+	defer_console_output();
+}
+
 int vprintk_deferred(const char *fmt, va_list args)
 {
 	int r;
diff --git a/lib/nmi_backtrace.c b/lib/nmi_backtrace.c
index f9e89001b52e..199ab201d501 100644
--- a/lib/nmi_backtrace.c
+++ b/lib/nmi_backtrace.c
@@ -75,6 +75,12 @@ void nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask,
 		touch_softlockup_watchdog();
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Force flush any remote buffers that might be stuck in IRQ context
+	 * and therefore could not run their irq_work.
+	 */
+	printk_trigger_flush();
+
 	clear_bit_unlock(0, &backtrace_flag);
 	put_cpu();
 }
-- 
2.23.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-06  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-04 15:54 Nicholas Piggin
2021-11-04 16:18 ` John Ogness
2021-11-05  1:26   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-11-05  9:55     ` John Ogness
2021-11-05 11:43       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-11-05 13:57         ` John Ogness
2021-11-05 16:23           ` Petr Mladek
2021-11-05 16:44             ` John Ogness
2021-11-06  0:26               ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2021-11-06 20:05                 ` John Ogness
2021-11-05 23:57             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-11-05 23:48           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-11-05 16:01     ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1636158295.cxlln6r0kk.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®