From: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>
To: Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
Prashanth T <prasht@in.ibm.com>,
rml@tech9.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rwlock_is_locked undefined for UP systems
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:14:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16391.65470.831998.936394@laputa.namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040116145311.GD1740@reti>
Joe Thornber writes:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:55:50PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 14:45, Prashanth T wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I had to use rwlock_is_locked( ) with linux2.6 for kdb and noticed that
> > > this routine to be undefined for UP. I have attached the patch for 2.6.1
> > > below to return 0 for rwlock_is_locked( ) on UP systems.
> > > Please let me know.
> >
> > I consider any user of this on UP to be broken, just like UP use of
> > spin_is_locked() is always a bug..... better a compiletime bug than a
> > runtime bug I guess...
>
> Then maybe a #error explaining this is in order ?
So, if there is a function
void foo_locked(struct bar *obj)
{
/* check that we are called with obj's lock held */
BUG_ON(!rwlock_is_locked(&obj->lock));
/* proceed with obj. */
}
it should now be changed to the
void foo_locked(struct bar *obj)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
BUG_ON(!rwlock_is_locked(&obj->lock));
#endif
/* proceed with obj. */
}
?
>
> - Joe
>
Nikita.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-16 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-16 13:45 Prashanth T
2004-01-16 13:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-16 14:53 ` Joe Thornber
2004-01-16 15:14 ` Nikita Danilov [this message]
2004-01-16 18:10 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-16 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-19 6:12 ` Prashanth T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16391.65470.831998.936394@laputa.namesys.com \
--to=nikita@namesys.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prasht@in.ibm.com \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=thornber@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®