mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5.4.y] Revert "ia64: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler"
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 21:59:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <164225155571.1964629.11131335649262508943.stgit@devnote2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YeEhuGXr2B9r7mer@kroah.com>

This reverts commit 77fa5e15c933a1ec812de61ad709c00aa51e96ae.

Since the upstream commit e792ff804f49720ce003b3e4c618b5d996256a18
depends on the generic kretprobe trampoline handler, which was
introduced by commit 66ada2ccae4e ("kprobes: Add generic kretprobe
trampoline handler") but that is not ported to the stable kernel
because it is not a bugfix series.
So revert this commit to fix a build error.

NOTE: I keep commit a7fe2378454c ("ia64: kprobes: Fix to pass
correct trampoline address to the handler") on the tree, that seems
just a cleanup without the original reverted commit, but it would
be better to use dereference_function_descriptor() macro instead
of accessing descriptor's field directly.

Fixes: 77fa5e15c933 ("ia64: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
  Changes in v2:
   - fix the lack of type casting for dereference_function_descriptor().
---
 arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c |   78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c
index 8a223d0e4918..fa10d51f6217 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -396,10 +396,83 @@ static void kretprobe_trampoline(void)
 {
 }
 
+/*
+ * At this point the target function has been tricked into
+ * returning into our trampoline.  Lookup the associated instance
+ * and then:
+ *    - call the handler function
+ *    - cleanup by marking the instance as unused
+ *    - long jump back to the original return address
+ */
 int __kprobes trampoline_probe_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	regs->cr_iip = __kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs,
-		dereference_function_descriptor(kretprobe_trampoline), NULL);
+	struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL;
+	struct hlist_head *head, empty_rp;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+	unsigned long flags, orig_ret_address = 0;
+	unsigned long trampoline_address =
+		(unsigned long)dereference_function_descriptor(kretprobe_trampoline);
+
+	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&empty_rp);
+	kretprobe_hash_lock(current, &head, &flags);
+
+	/*
+	 * It is possible to have multiple instances associated with a given
+	 * task either because an multiple functions in the call path
+	 * have a return probe installed on them, and/or more than one return
+	 * return probe was registered for a target function.
+	 *
+	 * We can handle this because:
+	 *     - instances are always inserted at the head of the list
+	 *     - when multiple return probes are registered for the same
+	 *       function, the first instance's ret_addr will point to the
+	 *       real return address, and all the rest will point to
+	 *       kretprobe_trampoline
+	 */
+	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ri, tmp, head, hlist) {
+		if (ri->task != current)
+			/* another task is sharing our hash bucket */
+			continue;
+
+		orig_ret_address = (unsigned long)ri->ret_addr;
+		if (orig_ret_address != trampoline_address)
+			/*
+			 * This is the real return address. Any other
+			 * instances associated with this task are for
+			 * other calls deeper on the call stack
+			 */
+			break;
+	}
+
+	regs->cr_iip = orig_ret_address;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ri, tmp, head, hlist) {
+		if (ri->task != current)
+			/* another task is sharing our hash bucket */
+			continue;
+
+		if (ri->rp && ri->rp->handler)
+			ri->rp->handler(ri, regs);
+
+		orig_ret_address = (unsigned long)ri->ret_addr;
+		recycle_rp_inst(ri, &empty_rp);
+
+		if (orig_ret_address != trampoline_address)
+			/*
+			 * This is the real return address. Any other
+			 * instances associated with this task are for
+			 * other calls deeper on the call stack
+			 */
+			break;
+	}
+	kretprobe_assert(ri, orig_ret_address, trampoline_address);
+
+	kretprobe_hash_unlock(current, &flags);
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ri, tmp, &empty_rp, hlist) {
+		hlist_del(&ri->hlist);
+		kfree(ri);
+	}
 	/*
 	 * By returning a non-zero value, we are telling
 	 * kprobe_handler() that we don't want the post_handler
@@ -412,7 +485,6 @@ void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
 				      struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->b0;
-	ri->fp = NULL;
 
 	/* Replace the return addr with trampoline addr */
 	regs->b0 = (unsigned long)dereference_function_descriptor(kretprobe_trampoline);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-15 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-12 20:15 [linux-stable-rc:linux-5.4.y 2563/9999] arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c:401:24: error: implicit declaration of function '__kretprobe_trampoline_handler'; did you mean 'kretprobe_trampoline'? kernel test robot
2022-01-13  9:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-14  7:04   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-14  7:09     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-14  7:49       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-14 10:19       ` [PATCH 5.4.y] Revert "ia64: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler" Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-14 11:00         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-15  4:58         ` kernel test robot
2022-01-15 10:13           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-15 12:59       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-01-24 15:09         ` [PATCH v2 " Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=164225155571.1964629.11131335649262508943.stgit@devnote2 \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome