From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511EDC433EF for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236244AbiAWLrD (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:47:03 -0500 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com ([185.125.188.123]:56418 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236141AbiAWLq4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:46:56 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972A33F1CF for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:46:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1642938415; bh=t1Mr2leewf+dJOw+raj7dTmlAldoGuESwLMLnJL3mUo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UeSY7HEbDIEI29Yuog5Wc7qmAGEEkRRL4gUX8ShE0tLoKj/CAI5idXe2LkObNTRYT GkDg9xVTO3wQ1QLw+ZubpMrqAnrabalTOTE0+qKgkCEstqIUpIqroVNnaVuawms4b/ AFYThjE8TMfGb6FJLrrVbANly3ZcIns76N0xF0yoJbaUUXlicLDeX1SsHn1Q4H0Hec aQDXPRnAIqoH4xYj1E/bgQDS5Z36S39LSv6Fy76kP7o8Qo3Dup3Bkdvw5Bo2qJfx8+ wNO2IUzae016VE+1eY2mmCdKOSOQfR9yDvlxYpG2RWAM5QPmHYpZxTEvL8cSCYjje1 U8F4m4n891yzg== Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id t2-20020a1c4602000000b0034f93a88debso76109wma.2 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 03:46:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t1Mr2leewf+dJOw+raj7dTmlAldoGuESwLMLnJL3mUo=; b=MTIFURiKAAGbzzXxgkBbrinoPDnzqGwZRQiWH6qtbHhSIP6Q+t69YWflsxMjbHhsP4 4LtzRm0eKVYU1gu6JnI1H8dE3Nl4KkHOsxEfn5ewS7NpcRrwNMiC2gL8AgDGx6d8EVJI +q/zLoTSfohYqzAH5iuTwumTAvjox1Ile3qaIL4itHQHDsVT5KlcEIKxLt3yUVnv1dad UIUMSOA2RZyi1mlxGnx4ZaIOYkAsYMLPkY1VPi6z3N9Qwy51iG4PB4GijBTXUhjrll7m AvsMPbCHWwpXKqiU2U35okXeHIsJ0N+WZpXTtgWNvc5/bVZYJkrw8wRcaREmJbOKG85L cfvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/jIPkbAFLXz5EoIX/Yk5Yh6eh3uRSt4dn0UcSqKJhMUCczuPR E/1Qce8Y6kGalv5TK79YsBEec4EubGIeLk8t/5OXOGjsmyeBh4GsMSsZycMqZGyOx8Bz9GDUBep NV/CGugENlR8l1l6jGVJFK4RndE1VzQJcwsH3sIpAGw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6e83:: with SMTP id k3mr10395743wrz.506.1642938415402; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 03:46:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS480IySxN7r/zMW68vwN+Cqc0h0XRSdNUxo2T7syZh+fpKi38vkV6Glz0y+IeA+oKqVXahQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6e83:: with SMTP id k3mr10395729wrz.506.1642938415273; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 03:46:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (xdsl-188-155-168-84.adslplus.ch. [188.155.168.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r2sm16992751wrz.99.2022.01.23.03.46.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 03:46:54 -0800 (PST) From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Sam Protsenko Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanho Park , Tomasz Figa , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Remove EINT handler for Exynos850 ALIVE and CMGP gpios Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:46:51 +0100 Message-Id: <164293835975.31601.16620899683024964008.b4-ty@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20220114203757.4860-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> References: <20220114203757.4860-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:37:57 +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote: > GPIO_ALIVE and GPIO_CMGP blocks in Exynos850 SoC don't have EINT > capabilities (like EINT_SVC register), and there are no corresponding > interrupts wired to GIC. Instead those blocks have wake-up interrupts > for each pin. The ".eint_gpio_init" callbacks were specified by mistake > for these blocks, when porting pinctrl code from downstream kernel. That > leads to error messages like this: > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] pinctrl: samsung: Remove EINT handler for Exynos850 ALIVE and CMGP gpios commit: 96f79935015cf3d7ca6fabf63cd13b8af45a7713 Best regards, -- Krzysztof Kozlowski