From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262845AbUBZSDC (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:03:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262844AbUBZSDC (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:03:02 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:25996 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262845AbUBZSC6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:02:58 -0500 From: Nikita Danilov MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16446.13520.5837.193556@laputa.namesys.com> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:02:56 +0300 To: markw@osdl.org Cc: piggin@cyberone.com.au, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: AS performance with reiser4 on 2.6.3 In-Reply-To: <200402261748.i1QHmJE12429@mail.osdl.org> References: <200402261748.i1QHmJE12429@mail.osdl.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org markw@osdl.org writes: > Hi Nick, > > I started getting some results with dbt-2 on 2.6.3 and saw that reiser4 > is doing a bit worse with the AS elevator. Although reiser4 wasn't > doing well to begin with, compared to the other filesystems. I have > links to the STP results on our 4-ways and 8-ways here: > http://developer.osdl.org/markw/fs/dbt2_stp_results.html There were no changes between 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 that could affect reiser4 performance, so it is not clear why numbers are so different. Probably results should be averaged over several runs. Also can you run test with http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.02.25/extra/e_05-proc-sleep.patch applied? To use it turn CONFIG_PROC_SLEEP on (depends on CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER), and do "cat /proc/sleep" before and after test run. > > -- > Mark Wong - - markw@osdl.org Nikita.